PENGARUH PENERAPAN STANDAR AKUNTANSI PEMERINTAH, IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM INFORMASI MANAJEMEN DAERAH, DAN SISTEM PENGENDALIAN INTERNAL PEMERINTAH TERHADAP KUALITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH KABUPATEN SELUMA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effect of application of government accounting standards, implementation of regional management information systems, and government internal control systems on the quality of financial statements at the regional government of seluma district. This research used a quantitative approach, using primary data through questionnaires. Respondents of this research were 26 OPD of part of a financial manager a the regonal governmnt of seluma district. The Variables in thiss researcch is the government accounting standards, implementation of regional management information systems, and govrnment internal contcl systems as independent variables, as well the qualty of local governmnt financiial statements as the dependent variable. The data were analyzed with multiple regression method. The results of hypothesis shown that the government accounting standards, implementation of regional management information systems, and governent internal contral systems give the impact add it was positive to the qality of financial statemnts at the ragional govermment of seluma district.Key words: Management Information Systems, And Government internal Control Systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it