Caspase-7 uses RNA to enhance proteolysis of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 and other RNA-binding proteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
KKK) located in the N-terminal domain of caspase-7 form such an exosite and promote the rapid proteolysis of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1), but the mechanism of recognition remains mostly unknown. In this study, we show that the overall positive charge of the exosite is the critical feature of this evolutionarily conserved binding site. Additionally, interaction with the caspase-7 exosite involves both the Zn3 and BRCT domains of PARP-1 and is mediated by RNA. Indeed, PARP-1 proteolysis efficacy is sensitive to RNase A and promoted by added RNA. Moreover, using affinity chromatography and gel shift assays, we demonstrate that caspase-7, but not caspase-3 or a caspase-7 with a mutated exosite, binds nucleic acids. Finally, we show that caspase-7 prefers RNA-binding proteins (RNA-BPs) as substrates compared to caspase-3 and that RNA enhances proteolysis by caspase-7 of many of these RNA-BPs. Thus, we have uncovered an unusual way by which caspase-7 selects and cleaves specific substrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".