MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979177008 · doi:10.4000/insitu.22950

Les lits royaux de la Renaissance à la lumière des archives de Louis XIV

2019· article· fr· W2979177008 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIn Situ · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtThe RenaissanceHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En matière de lits, les collections royales françaises conservaient à la Renaissance des œuvres exceptionnelles, mais, en raison de leur disparition au xviiie siècle et du caractère lacunaire des comptes et des inventaires, il est souvent difficile d’en avoir une connaissance précise. Pourtant les documents descriptifs rédigés postérieurement, lorsque les œuvres existaient encore, peuvent nous aider notablement à préciser leur apparence. De ce point de vue, l’Inventaire général du mobilier de la Couronne sous Louis XIV (1673), publié par Jules Guiffrey à la fin du xixe siècle, qui décrit un certain nombre de lits ou de dais de la Renaissance, s’avère d’une grande utilité. L’article est suivi de la publication révisée des descriptions des lits, accompagnées de l’historique de ceux-ci tel qu’il peut être reconstitué à l’aide des inventaires et des archives du Garde-Meuble.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it