MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979229192 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.119.026922

One-Year Home-Time and Mortality After Thrombolysis Compared With Nontreated Patients in a Propensity-Matched Analysis

2019· article· en· W2979229192 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amy Yu, Jiming Fang, Moira K. Kapral

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisHazard ratioStroke (engine)Propensity score matchingNursing homesProportional hazards modelInternal medicineTissue plasminogen activatorConfidence intervalEmergency medicineSurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose— Intravenous thrombolysis with r-tPA (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) is associated with improved early functional outcome after stroke, but its long-term effects are less understood. We aimed to determine the association between r-tPA and 1-year outcomes after stroke. Methods— We used the Ontario Stroke Registry to identify patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke between 2002 and 2013 in Ontario, Canada, their baseline characteristics, and whether they received r-tPA. We used propensity score methods to match patients treated with r-tPA to nontreated patients. The primary outcome was 1-year home-time, defined as the number of days spent outside of any healthcare institutions in the first 365 days after the index date of admission. Secondary outcomes were admission to a nursing home and all-cause mortality in the first year. Outcomes were determined using linked administrative data. We used paired t tests to compare mean home-time days and Cox proportional hazards models for mortality and nursing home admission to estimate hazard ratios and 95% CI. Results— All 4449 patients treated with r-tPA in the registry were matched to nontreated patients. Compared with nontreated patients, those treated with r-tPA experienced more time at home in the first year (mean±SD was 248.9 days±137.2 treated versus 239.4 days±139.0 nontreated, P =0.005) and were less likely to be admitted to nursing homes (9.4% treated versus 12.2% nontreated; hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78–0.91). One-year all-cause mortality was similar between the 2 groups (13.2% treated versus 12.4% nontreated; hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.96–1.20). Conclusions— Despite similar mortality, patients who received r-tPA spent more time at home and were less likely to require nursing home admission in the first year after stroke compared with nontreated patients, suggesting long-term benefits and safety of this treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207