MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Infliximab as Rescue Therapy for Moderate to Severe Colonic Crohnʼs Disease Requiring IV Corticosteroid Therapy

2011· article· en· W2979253763 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie-Pier Bachand, Nathalie Carrier, Sophie Plamondon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseCrohn's diseaseAdverse effectMedical recordInternal medicineRescue therapyComplicationRetrospective cohort studySurgeryDiseaseCorticosteroidColitisGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Infliximab (IFX) has been shown to benefit patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis but its role as rescue therapy in severely active Crohn's colitis is less well documented. The primary objective of our study was to assess the frequency of medical treatment failure in these patients requiring IFX or IV corticosteroids (CS) alone for induction. Methods: The medical records of all patients hospitalized at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke for acute severe Crohn's disease between 2001 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients aged > 18 years old with colonic Crohn's disease, presenting with moderately to severely active disease [Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI)>9] requiring IV steroids were included. We assessed the frequency of urgent surgery. Steroid-free remission at 1 year, adverse events related to medical therapy and post-operative complications are also reported. Results: 114 patients were included in the study (64 women, median age 42 years, median disease duration 12 months, mean HBI score 16). Thirty-four patients were first diagnosed during the index hospitalization (29.8%) and 94 patients (92%) had isolated colonic Crohn's disease. CS alone were used in 79 patients; 35 patients required treatment with IFX due to lack of response to IV steroids. Eight of the 35 patients(22.9%) receiving IFX as rescue therapy required surgery during the hospital stay compared with 11 of the 79 (13.9%) who received iv CS alone (p=0.238). The two groups had similar post-operative complication rates except for a higher rate of thromboembolism in the IFX group (3 vs 0; p=0.058). Three patients (1 in IFX group, 2 in CS group) had a severe infection. Patients requiring IFX as rescue therapy had a more complicated disease defined as penetrating disease (11.4% vs 1.3%; p=0.03) or severe disease (80% vs 50.6%; p=0.027). Higher C-reactive protein (CRP), lower serum albumin level and higher rate of bleeding during the first 7 days of hospitalization tended to predict the need for infliximab as well as the need for urgent surgery. Steroid-free remission was achieved sooner in patients receiving infliximab compared with those who were managed with IV steroids alone (79.1 days vs 149.3 days; p=0.007). There was also a trend towards higher rates of steroid-free clinical remission at 1 year (56.2% vs 36.6%; p=0.062). Conclusion: The rate of urgent surgery was similar in patients receiving rescue infliximab or IV steroids alone for acute severe colonic Crohn's disease. Patients who successfully received infliximab as rescue therapy were more likely to be in steroid-free remission at 1 year than patients treated with IV steroids alone. They also received shorter steroid courses despite having more severe disease at presentation.Table. Outcomes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→