GNF-2, An Allosteric BCR-ABL Inhibitor, Identifies a Novel Myristoylation-Mediated Mechanism Regulating the Ability of BCR-ABL to Activate HCK and IGF-1 Signaling.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 40 Pharmacologic inhibition of BCR-ABL, using clinically active ATP-competitive inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib, has been used to investigate BCR-ABL kinase activated signaling pathways. However, these agents show cross reactivity with other kinases (e.g. Kit, PDGFR, SRC family members), and their multi-targeted nature complicates assigning biological effects to the inhibition of a specific kinase target. Allosteric kinase inhibitors modulate the catalytic activity of protein kinases by binding to a site distant from the active site and inducing a protein conformation that inhibits kinase activity. These agents show promise as clinical agents and may offer advantages over ATP-competitive inhibitors in studying the function of specific kinases because they exploit binding sites and regulatory mechanisms that are unique to a particular kinase. GNF-2, a mono-selective BCR-ABL inhibitor that targets wild-type BCR-ABL and many clinically relevant imatinib resistant mutants, was recently discovered and provided the first demonstration that c-ABL kinase activity could be modulated by an inhibitor that binds outside the ATP or substrate binding sites. GNF-2 binds to a myristoyl-binding pocket in the C-lobe of the c-ABL kinase domain but its mechanism of inhibiting specific BCR-ABL kinase targets remains unclear. We previously reported that BCR-ABL activates an autocrine IGF-1 pro-survival signaling pathway in CML blast crisis cells through HCK-mediated activation of STAT5b. As GNF-2 is known to inhibit STAT5b phosphorylation, and HCK myristolyation is known to regulate its cellular localization, we hypothesized that GNF-2 inhibits BCR-ABL activation of HCK by binding to the ABL myristoyl-binding pocket and blocking access to the HCK myristoyl moiety. In support of this hypothesis, we now show that GNF-2 inhibits HCK phosphorylation and IGF-1 activation, but not HCK binding to BCR-ABL. To confirm the importance of the HCK myristoyl moiety in HCK activation, we mutated the myristoyl attachment site at position 2 in HCK from glycine to alanine. The mutant G2A HCK still interacted with BCR-ABL in co-immunoprecipitation assays but showed significantly lower levels of phosphorylation compared to wild-type HCK. To confirm that the decrease in phosphorylation was not due to mislocalization of G2A HCK, we mutated the myristoylation binding pocket of BCR-ABL by changing glutamic acid at position 505 to lysine. Similar to G2A HCK, E505K BCR-ABL still interacted with HCK, but the phosphorylation levels of HCK were dramatically reduced. To confirm that the HCK myristoyl moiety directly interacted with the ABL myristoyl-binding pocket, we used fluorescent spectroscopy to measure the ability of a myristoylated peptide corresponding to the six N-terminal amino acids of HCK to displace GNF-2. The fluorescence of GNF-2 is enhanced when it associates with the myristoyl-binding pocket of ABL. Using this assay, we calculated the Kd of GNF-2 to be 180 nM. We then assayed the ability of myristolyated HCK peptide to displace GNF-2 from ABL. We calculated the IC50 of the myristolyated HCK peptide to be 25 μM when ABL was saturated with 300 nM GNF-2. Myristate showed an IC50 of 213 μM, which is ∼ 10-fold higher than the myristoylated peptide. No binding was detected between the non-myristoylated peptide and ABL. Together, our study highlights a novel acquired function resulting from the fusion of BCR to the N-terminus of ABL, which converts the myristoyl-binding pocket in ABL from a negative regulator of kinase activity to an HCK activation motif that activates downstream IGF-1 signaling. These results also reveal the mechanism of action of the mono-selective BCR-ABL inhibitor GNF-2 and highlight the ABL myristoyl-binding pocket as a therapeutic target for inhibiting BCR-ABL activity. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".