Some thoughts on metasomatism in pegmatites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| September 30, 2019 Some thoughts on metasomatism in pegmatites Robert Linnen; Robert Linnen § Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada § Corresponding author e-mail address: rlinnen@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Alysha McNeil; Alysha McNeil Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Roberta Flemming Roberta Flemming Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Robert Linnen § Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada Alysha McNeil Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada Roberta Flemming Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada § Corresponding author e-mail address: rlinnen@uwo.ca Publisher: Mineralogical Association of Canada First Online: 07 Oct 2019 Online Issn: 1499-1276 Print Issn: 0008-4476 © 2019 Mineralogical Association of Canada The Canadian Mineralogist (2019) 57 (5): 765–766. https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.AB00016 Article history First Online: 07 Oct 2019 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Robert Linnen, Alysha McNeil, Roberta Flemming; Some thoughts on metasomatism in pegmatites. The Canadian Mineralogist 2019;; 57 (5): 765–766. doi: https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.AB00016 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyThe Canadian Mineralogist Search Advanced Search The ways in which the behaviors of elements are considered in igneous petrology is fundamentally different from the ways the same elements are considered in studies of hydrothermal alteration. In igneous petrology, elements are commonly thought of as being compatible or incompatible between different phases. Specific elements or groups of elements, e.g., large ion lithophile (LILE) or high field strength (HFSE), tend to be controlled by specific substitution mechanisms in minerals. The variations of the concentrations of elements in both minerals and melts are largely modelled by using partition coefficients. Systems can either be closed, e.g., batch melting,... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".