Adiposity and asthma in adults: a bidirectional Mendelian randomisation analysis of The HUNT Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the potential causal associations of adiposity with asthma overall, asthma by atopic status or by levels of symptom control in a large adult population and stratified by sex. We also investigated the potential for reverse causation between asthma and risk of adiposity. METHODS: We performed a bidirectional one-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) study using the Norwegian Nord-Trøndelag Health Study population including 56 105 adults. 73 and 47 genetic variants were included as instrumental variables for body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), respectively. Asthma was defined as ever asthma, doctor-diagnosed asthma and doctor-diagnosed active asthma, and was further classified by atopic status or levels of symptom control. Causal OR was calculated with the Wald method. RESULTS: ) increase in genetically determined BMI were ranged from 1.36 to 1.49 for the three asthma definitions and similar for women and men. The corresponding ORs for non-atopic asthma (range 1.42-1.72) appeared stronger than those for the atopic asthma (range 1.18-1.26), but they were similar for controlled versus partly controlled doctor-diagnosed active asthma (1.43 vs 1.44). There was no clear association between genetically predicted WHR and asthma risk or between genetically predicted asthma and the adiposity markers. CONCLUSIONS: Our MR study provided evidence of a causal association of BMI with asthma in adults, particularly with non-atopic asthma. There was no clear evidence of a causal link between WHR and asthma or of reverse causation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".