Results of Phase II Study of Lenalidomide (L) {Revlimid®} in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Lenalidomide (L) is a compound in a new group of drugs called ImiDs® which have Immunomodulatory properties and with anti-tumor activity reported in multiple myeloma and MDS. Although the exact mechanism of action of L is unknown, they are reported to affect the tumor microenvironment through modulation of critical cytokines such as TNF-a, VEGF and IL-6. These cytokines also play an important role in pathogenesis of CLL. Based on these properties we have investigated and previously reported on the anti-leukemic activity of thalidomide in CLL. We subsequently conducted a phase II study with L, to evaluate its clinical activity in pts with relapse (rel) or refractory (ref) CLL. Here we present the results of this study. Patients and Methods: CLL pts with rel or ref disease were eligible. L was given at 25mg PO QD x 21 days followed by 7 days rest on a 28 day cycle. Absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) were measured at Day 0, 7 and 30. Response was assessed at day 30 and monthly thereafter using the NCI-WG 1996 criteria. Pts with stable disease (SD) or better response were continued on therapy for a maximum of 12 months while those with progressive disease (PD) were to receive rituximab (R) (375mg/m2) added to L. Pts were considered evaluable for response if they completed at least 2 months of treatment. Target enrollment is 29 patients. Results: Twenty nine pts, median age of 64 years (range: 47–75) were enrolled. All pts are available for toxicity and 17 out of 29 pts available for response evaluation. Three pts on treatment are too early for response assessment while 9 pts are off study (2 withdrew consent and 5 got < 2 months of therapy due to toxicity). Response is reported based on evaluable pts. Complete remission (CR) was noted in 2/17 (11.7%) pts while partial remission (PR) was noted in 9/17 (52.9%) pts. Additional 5/17 (29.4%) pts, currently on treatment, achieved stable disease (SD). ORR (CR+PR) in the intent to treat population is 42.3% (11/26, excluding pts currently too early for response assessment). To date only 1 pt has PD after 3 months of L and is on LR per protocol. Toxicity: Flare reaction (tender swelling of lymph nodes and/or rash) was the most common SE noted in almost all pts. Other important SE were tumor lysis syndrome (n=2); grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities (n=7) and febrile neutropenia (n=3). Conclusion: This is the first study to report the clinical activity of L in pts with CLL. Our findings are encouraging and provide evidence of the anti-CLL activity of L. Although some of the pts did achieve a CR, longer follow-up will determine the durability of responses noted to date. Update results of this study along with toxicity profile of L in CLL will be presented at the meeting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".