MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979451775 · doi:10.1063/1.5118365

Bi-global stability analysis in curvilinear coordinates

2019· article· en· W2979451775 on OpenAlexafffund
Jinchun Wang, Paul Ziadé, Guoping Huang, Pierre E. Sullivan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFoundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChina Scholarship CouncilGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsInstabilityPhysicsMechanicsCurvilinear coordinatesReynolds numberDimensionless quantityAirfoilFlow separationShear flowAngle of attackStratified flowFlow (mathematics)Classical mechanicsBoundary layerTurbulenceAerodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method is developed to solve biglobal stability functions in curvilinear systems which avoids reshaping of the airfoil or remapping the disturbance flow fields. As well, the biglobal stability functions for calculation in a curvilinear system are derived. The instability features of the flow over a NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics) 0025 airfoil at two different angles of attack, corresponding to a flow with a separation bubble and a fully separated flow, are investigated at a chord-based Reynolds number of 100 000. The most unstable mode was found to be related to the wake instability, with a dimensionless frequency close to one. For the flow with a separation bubble, there is an instability plateau in the dimensionless frequency ranging from 2 to 5.5. After the plateau and for an increasing dimensionless frequency, the growth rate of the most unstable mode decreases. For a fully separated flow, the plateau is narrower than that for the flow with a separation bubble. After the plateau, with an increased dimensionless frequency, the growth rate of the most unstable mode decreases and then increases once again. The growth rate of the upstream shear layer instability was found to be larger than that of the downstream shear layer instability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207