MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979465929 · doi:10.17192/z2016.0899

Pilotstudie zur Messung der mechanischen Berührungs-,Druckschmerz- und Vibrationsempfindungsschwellebei Therapie der Gonarthrose mit Hirudo medicinalis

2016· article· en· W2979465929 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Maurice Müller

Bibliographic record

VenuePublikationsserver (Universitat Marburg) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLeech Biology and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Osteoarthritis of the knee (KOA) leads to severe and often debilitating symptoms such as pain, constrained movement, immobility, and reduced quality of life and the incidence is still increasing. Previous randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown a significant pain reduction using leeches for the treatment of KOA. The way how leeching improves the symptoms of KOA is still unclear. The aim of this study was to pilot if the measurement of somatosensory function is a way to investigate the mechanism of action of leech therapy treating KOA. Methods: 42 patients with bilateral KOA participated in the case series pilot study. Neurophysiological measures of local pain perception at the knee were subtests obtained from the QST (Quantitative sensory testing) protocol: MDT (mechanical detection threshold), VDT (Vibration detection threshold) and PPT (Pressure pain threshold). All QST subtests were obtained at defined areas of both knees and at the hands as a control area for systematic treatment effects. Moreover, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was obtained before and seven days after therapy in addition to pain measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS, day 0 and day 7). Based on the QST results a case number was calculated. Results: MDT was generally lowered after treatment indicating a better discrimination of mechanical stimuli. The effect was significant (p=0.008) for the area close to the pain. In order to prove the standardized difference with a statistical power of β=80% in a following RCT 170 patients are needed. Whereas a statistical power of β=80% requires 228 patients. There was a general significant treatment effect for VDT resulting in less vibration discrimination for all sites (p<0.05) with the exception of the most affected knee. No consistent effects were seen for PPT. Clinical pain improved significantly (WOMAC global, pain, function, and VAS: p<0.001). Discussion: Due to the study design it can not be concluded that leeching improves somatosensory function. However, there are essential findings concerning feasibility, methodologies and results along with the corresponding case number calculation. These findings can then be implemented in a following RCT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublikationsserver (Universitat Marburg)Same topicLeech Biology and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207