The Consequences One Can Face Upon Leaving The Religion of Islam In the West
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Religion is defined as the belief in a superhuman controlling power. For many, religion assists in providing an outlet to express personal connections with the natural world and deep and spiritual connections to oneself. In some religions, sects, and individuals; however, religion goes beyond the personal spiritual journey and begins to influence one’s diet, hobbies, wardrobe, and approach to the family unit. Because of these significant influences, leaving a religion may cause families to be break apart, and as a result, deeply adverse psychological effects can be observed. This manifestation of trauma as a result of leaving is very prevalent in the religion of Islam. Many Muslims, or rather ex-Muslims that suffer from a crisis in faith fear for the consequences that may arise from leaving the religion. These potential consequences may include involuntary emancipation from the nuclear and extended family, divorce, and in certain extreme circumstances, even death. One would think that these punishments would not really exist in the West yet, there are clear with the last twenty years of individuals being abused and murdered simply because of a lapse in their personal connection with Islam. Faculty Mentor: Leo Wong Department: Business
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".