MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979641853 · doi:10.2172/1498640

Automated High Power Permanent Borehole Seismic Source Systems for Long-Term Monitoring of Subsurface CO2 Containment and Storage

2019· report· en· W2979641853 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Energy Technology LaboratoryOffice of Fossil EnergyU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBoreholeContainment (computer programming)Greenhouse gasEnvironmental scienceTest siteEngineeringMining engineeringGeologyComputer scienceGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The geologic storage of CO2 emitted from fixed sources, such as coal or gas power plants, is currently considered one of the prime technologies for short term (~50 year) mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. The subsurface storage of CO2 for greenhouse gas mitigation will require monitoring to verify that CO2 remains effectively trapped underground, thus permanent seismic sources are needed to provide 24/7 monitoring. GPUSA Inc. has developed and successfully demonstrated numerous prototype vibratory seismic sources with power and performance far beyond any available on the market. The primary objective of this project was to validate in an operational field environment GPUSA’s powerful, low cost, automated borehole seismic source systems for the CO2 storage monitoring application. GPUSA originally proposed the building and testing of two types of permanent sources but ended up building and delivering three types of permanent seismic sources. These sources were delivered to the field test site (Carbon Management Canada’s Containment and Monitoring site near Calgary), however, only two of the systems were able to be tested before the contract ended (despite two contract extensions). The reasons for the delay were primarily weather related both at the US preliminary field test site and Carbon Management Canada site. But in the end, based upon the preliminary field testing in the US and the limited testing that was completed at the Carbon Management Canada site, the results were very impressive, and in some cases far exceeding expectations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207