Ageing augments nicotinic and adenosine triphosphate‐induced, but not muscarinic, cutaneous vasodilatation in women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Does ageing augment muscarinic, nicotinic and/or ATP-mediated cutaneous vasodilatation in women? What is the main finding and its importance? Ageing augments nicotinic and ATP-induced, but not muscarinic, cutaneous vasodilatation in women. This will stimulate future studies assessing the pathophysiological significance of the augmented microvascular responsiveness in older women compared to their young counterparts. ABSTRACT: We previously reported that ageing attenuates adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-induced, but not muscarinic and nicotinic, cutaneous vasodilatation in men, and that ageing may augment cutaneous vascular responses in women. In the present study, we evaluated the hypothesis that ageing augments muscarinic, nicotinic and/or ATP-mediated cutaneous vasodilatation in healthy women. In 11 young (23 ± 5 years) and 11 older (60 ± 8 years) women, cutaneous vascular conductance was evaluated at three forearm skin sites that were perfused with (1) methacholine (muscarinic receptor agonist, 5 doses: 0.0125, 0.25, 5, 100, 2000 mm), (2) nicotine (nicotinic receptor agonist, 5 doses: 1.2, 3.6, 11, 33, 100 mm), or (3) ATP (purinergic receptor agonist, 5 doses: 0.03, 0.3, 3, 30, 300 mm). Each agonist was administered for 25 min per dose. Methacholine-induced increases in cutaneous vascular conductance were not different between groups at all doses (all P > 0.05). However, a nicotine-induced elevation in cutaneous vascular conductance at the lowest concentration (1.2 mm) was greater in older vs. young women (43 ± 15 vs. 26 ± 10%max, P = 0.04). ATP-induced increases in cutaneous vascular conductance at moderate and high doses (3 and 30 mm) were also greater in older relative to young women (3 mm, 44 ± 11 vs. 28 ± 10%max, P = 0.02; 30 mm, 83 ± 14 vs. 64 ± 17%max, P = 0.05). Therefore, ageing augments nicotinic and ATP-induced, but not muscarinic, cutaneous vasodilatation in women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".