MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization of the Microrna Expression Profiles of Paired Primary and Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) By Next-Generation Sequencing

2014· article· en· W2979669873 on OpenAlexaff
Suvi‐Katri Leivonen, Katherine Icay, Chengyu Liu, Minna Taskinen, Rainer Lehtonen, Marja‐Liisa Karjalainen‐Lindsberg, Jan Delabie, Harald Holte, Sampsa Hautaniemi, Sirpa Leppä

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmicroRNADiffuse large B-cell lymphomaBiologyGene expression profilingDeep sequencingLymphomaCancer researchComputational biologyGene expressionOncologyGeneGeneticsMedicineImmunologyGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma in adults. Although 60-70% of the patients can be cured with standard therapeutic regimens, a substantial number of patients die from the disease due to treatment resistance. In order to better understand the biological processes behind the resistance to treatment, we have characterized the microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles of matched primary and relapsed DLBCL. We performed next-generation miRNA sequencing of seven primary–relapse sample pairs. A total of 492 known miRNAs were found to be expressed in the DLBCL samples. In addition, we identified 223 potentially novel, previously uncharacterized miRNAs. A majority of the detected miRNAs showed similar expression across primary and relapse samples; we identified 24 high-expressed miRNAs and 177 low-expressed miRNAs in the DLBCL samples as compared to a reference control set of non-malignant cells downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE15229). Interestingly, only 13 miRNAs had differential expression between the primary–relapse sample pairs. Of these, five miRNAs had higher expression and eight miRNAs had lower expression in the relapse samples as compared to the primary samples. In order to identify potential targets for the differentially expressed miRNAs, we integrated the miRNA data with total RNA-sequencing data from the same samples (n=10, or 5 pairs) as well as with the miRNA target predictions from four prediction programs (TargetScan, microCosm, PITA, DIANA microT) and with filtered data of functionally validated miRNA targets from the miRTarBase. This analysis resulted in 1,088 miRNA-transcript pairs representing 787 individual genes inversely correlated with at least one of the 13 miRNAs (r<-0.7, p<0.05), and whose regulatory pairings were supported by at least one prediction program or mirTarBase. Further Gene Ontology annotation and pathway enrichment analyses revealed the putative targets of differentially expressed miRNAs to be significantly enriched for several cancer-associated pathways that include phosphatidyl-inositol signaling (e.g. PIP5K1A, PIK3C2A, PIK3CG, PIK3R1), JAK-STAT signaling (e.g. STAT5A, STAT5B), and B-cell receptor signaling (e.g.SYK, MAPK1), suggesting activation of these pathways in the relapsed DLBCL. In line with this, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses indicated higher expression of genes from the phosphatidyl-inositol signaling and B-cell receptor signaling, such as phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase (PIP5K1A) and spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK), to be associated with shorter progression-free and overall survival (p<0.001 for both genes) in immunochemotherapy-treated patients (n=92).Validations of the findings are currently ongoing. In conclusion, our study on the comparison of paired primary and relapsed DLBCL demonstrates that the miRNA expression profile remains relatively constant during the disease progression. However, a small set of differentially expressed miRNAs may contribute to the relapse by regulating key cell survival pathways, thus representing potential novel therapeutic targets. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207