MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Surgery in Patients with Factor VIII Inhibitors: A Retrospective Case Series at the Largest Canadian Hemophilia Care Centre

2016· article· en· W2979681014 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aditi Khandelwal, Syed Mahamad, Jerome Teitel, Michelle Sholzberg

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeSurgeryRetrospective cohort studyFactor IXPopulationRecombinant factor VIIaSingle CenterProthrombin complex concentrateRisk factorClotting factorInternal medicineWarfarin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors develop in a significant proportion of patients with severe congenital hemophilia A (CHA) and is also rarely acquired (AHA). These patients are at high risk of bleeding, particularly with surgical challenge. FVIII bypassing therapy and porcine factor VIII products have decreased the risk of bleeding complications and provided the opportunity for elective surgical intervention in this patient population. Factor VIII bypassing agents include activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (aPCC or FEIBA) and activated recombinant Factor VII (rFVIIa, Niastase). Porcine factor VIII products include plasma-derived Hyate C (historically) and currently, recombinant Obizur. To our knowledge, this is the largest Canadian review of perioperative management and outcomes in patients with factor VIII inhibitors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of CHA with FVIII inhibitors and AHA who underwent surgery at the largest Canadian Hemophilia Treatment Center (HTC) between January 1, 1998 - December 31, 2015. The primary objectives were to describe perioperative characteristics, hemostatic therapy use (including adjunctive), bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes. All included patients had to have an evidence of high responding inhibitor either previously or at the time of surgical intervention. Results: Twenty-two patients (10/22 with AHA) had surgical procedures at our institution between 1998 and 2015. All CHA were male, with the average age of 33 years (ranging 16 to 50 years) at first surgery at our center. Two out of 10 AHA were women. Mean age at first surgery for AHA patients was 59 years (ranging 24 to 85 years). A total of 21 major procedures and 26 minor procedures were performed (using World Hemophilia Federation definitions). The major procedures included 11 orthopedic procedures, nine abdominal surgeries and one breast surgery. Minor procedures included 11 oesophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs), three tracheostomies, two colonoscopies, two cystoscopies, two dental extractions, one nasopharyngoscopy, one bronchoscopy, one arthroscopy, one pacemaker insertion, one burr hole for subdural hemorrhage and one arteriovenous fistula creation. For each procedure, a hemophilia-focused hematologist tailored the hemostatic strategy. aPCC was used in six procedures and rFVIIa was used in 18 procedures. Two procedures required first rFVIIa then transition to aPCC; one procedure was managed with FVIII then rFVIIa and aPCC sequentially due to minor bleeding. One patient with subdural hematoma received high dose FVIII followed by porcine FVIII and aPCC in preparation for an urgent burr hole for hematoma evacuation. High dose FVIII alone was used in seven procedures, while a combination of FVIII and rFVIIa was used in three procedures and FVIII with aPCC in three procedures. Three patients, all of whom were AHA patients, experienced adverse perioperative outcomes. One patient had six urgent laparotomies for hepatojejunostomy complicated by abdominal compartment syndrome, recurrent hemorrhage, intra-abdominal abscess drainage and large ventral hernia mesh repair. Despite the severity of her illness, this patient made a full recovery and remains in complete remission. Another patient undergoing partial bowel resection for Crohn's disease had an intra-abdominal hemorrhage requiring repeat laparotomy. The third patient had esophageal cancer with recurrent bleeding from radiation gastritis. He underwent four OGDs and later died from metastatic disease. Conclusions: FVIII bypassing agents and porcine FVIII products have allowed for the safe performance of a variety of major and minor surgical procedures at our HTC in patients with FVIII inhibitors. Excessive perioperative bleeding despite hemostatic therapy that required repetitive surgical/endoscopic intervention occurred exclusively in AHA patients. Disclosures Sholzberg: Novonordisk: Honoraria; Shire (previously Baxter, Baxalta): Honoraria, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemophilia Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→