MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979694653 · doi:10.1049/enb.2019.0009

Engineered gene networks enable non‐genetic drug resistance and enhanced cellular robustness

2019· article· en· W2979694653 on OpenAlexafffund
Brendan Camellato, Ian J. Roney, Afnan Azizi, Daniel A. Charlebois, Mads Kærn

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Biology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyGeneGene regulatory networkGene expressionDrug resistanceRobustness (evolution)Computational biologyRegulation of gene expressionBiological networkGeneticsMultiple drug resistanceSystems biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drug resistance complicates the treatment of cancer and infectious diseases, and often arises from the elevated expression of a gene that neutralises or reduces drug activity. To investigate this and other expression‐based mechanisms of drug resistance, the authors engineered a set of gene regulatory networks in the eukaryotic model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae to control a homologue of the cancer‐related human multidrug resistance gene MDR1 . Using this system, they explored experimentally how different gene regulatory network features, also called genetic network motifs, contribute to gene expression dynamics and cellular fitness. They observed that coherent feedforward and positive feedback motifs enable rapid and self‐sustained activation of gene expression, and enhance cell survival in the presence of a cytotoxic drug. These observations underscore that genetic network motifs can be critical for drug resistance and that genetic network engineering can be used to enhance cellular tolerance to cytotoxins or other environmental stresses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering BiologySame topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207