MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979733152 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2019.8861937

Frequency Scan Based Stability Analysis of an LCC-HVdc System

2019· article· en· W2979733152 on OpenAlexaff
Mahsa Shirinzad, Moumita Das, A.M. Gole

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNyquist stability criterionGridStability (learning theory)Frequency domainElectric power systemComputer scienceSIGNAL (programming language)Control theory (sociology)Nyquist–Shannon sampling theoremNyquist frequencyHVDC converterElectronic engineeringPower (physics)EngineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsPhysicsTransformerBandwidth (computing)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frequency scanning is a method for extracting the small-signal model of a power electronic system (PES) by injecting a wide-band signal in its time-domain simulation at steady state. This paper presents the stability analysis of the interactions between a Line Commutated Converter HVdc system (LCC-HVdc) and its ac grid using a frequency scanning technique. In this study, DQ based frequency scanning technique is used to extract the model of the HVdc system and the ac grid independently. Using the obtained model of the HVdc and the ac grid, two different approaches i.e. the Generalized Nyquist Criterion (GNC) and Eigenloci analysis are used to access the stability of the combined system. A comparison is given on the use these two methods for stability analysis. The methods presented in this paper can be used for the stability analysis of the interactions between any arbitrary PES and its ac grid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207