Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zebrafish are aquatic organisms that are capable of detecting the injury of others in their species via an olfactory ‘alarm cue’ that is released by injured fish. Chondroitin sulphate, a chemical compound extracted from shark cartilage, has recently been identified as a possible ‘alarm cue’. The aim of this study was to determine whether, and at which concentration, chondroitin sulphate could induce a behavioural response. This was assessed via a dose-response curve in which fish were dosed with varying concentrations of chondroitin sulphate (1, 10, and 100 mg/L), and tested in an open field test followed by a novel object approach test. We assessed the time fish spent in certain zones within the testing arena, the distance each fish moved, and the amount of time fish was immobile. There was a significant increase in the time fish in the 1 mg/L and 100 mg/L groups spent in the thigmotaxis zone during the novel object approach test in comparison to the control condition. This suggests an increase in anxiety-like behaviour with certain doses of chondroitin sulphate. Faculty Mentors: Trevor Hamilton and Michele Moscicki Department: Psychology
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".