MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Differential Expression of Immunity Related Genes and Early Prediction of Severe Graft Versus Host Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

2016· article· en· W2979902603 on OpenAlexaff
Poonam Dharmani‐Khan, Rehan M. Faridi, Ariz Akhter, Amit Kalra, Jan Storek, Faisal Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraft-versus-host diseaseImmunologyTransplantationHaematopoiesisHematopoietic stem cell transplantationPeripheral blood mononuclear cellMedicineImmune systemGene expression profilingGeneGene expressionBiologyStem cellInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is curative for hematological malignancies. However, Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is the most common and debilitating complication of HCT as 10-15% HCT recipients die and 25% suffer long-term due to GVHD. Effective but toxic prophylaxes for GVHD (e.g., anti-thymocyte globulin) exist that can be given preemptively to patients with high risk of GVHD. However, an early and accurate identification of patients who are at a high risk of developing severe GVHD is the prerequisite for any preemptive therapy. The 'onset' of symptoms associated with GVHD is the final manifestation of a series of cellular and molecular perturbations that take place when host epithelial cells are attacked by the donor immune cells. With the aim of identifying potential functional biomarkers for early prediction of severe GVHD, a comprehensive panel of 594 genes shared among 24 immunology-related gene networks were retrospectively analyzed at different posttransplant time points prior to the onset of GVHD . Methods: Two hundred and two RNA specimens from 117 first allogeneic HCT recipients with (n=49) or without (n=68) clinically significant GVHD were analyzed. RNA was extracted from cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) collected at three early post-transplant time points: one week (n=32), one month (n=85) and two months (n=80) after transplantation. Messenger RNA counts for 594 human genes with immunity related functions and 15 internal reference genes were obtained using Nanostring based gene expression CodeSet profiling. Empirical Bayes statistics for differential gene expression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and principle component analyses were performed using R statistical packages to identify the gene sets with highest sensitivity and specificity for early prediction of clinically significant GVHD. Results: A 'GVHD transcript panel' comprising of highly upregulated 6 genes with T cell related pro-inflammatory functions was identified at one month post transplantation in patients with clinically significant GVHD (grade II-IV acute GVHD (median day of onset = 34 days) and/or chronic GVHD requiring systemic therapy, median day of onset = 108 days). The panel consists of CD27 (AUC=0.93; p=3.4X10-8); B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator, BTLA ((AUC=0.92; p=3.4X10-8),Inducible T-cell Co-stimulator, ICOS (AUC=0.90; p=3.5X10-7), CD5 (AUC=0.87; p=8.5X10-7), CD3D (AUC=0.88; p=8.8X10-7) and CD28 (AUC=0.91; p=9.9X10-7). The GVHD transcript panel predicted clinically significant GVHD with sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 95%. Conclusions: The findings strongly favor the early prediction of clinically significant GVHD made possible by differential expression profile of genes associated with T cell related pro-inflammatory functions The identified 'GVHD transcript panel' is highly sensitive and specific in identifying patients at a high risk of developing GVHD and can pave the way to precision HCT medicine. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→