MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Notch Signaling Requires Gfi1 for T Cell Development

2011· article· en· W2979946059 on OpenAlexaff
James D. Phelan, Ingrid Saba, Chinavenmeni S. Velu, Tarik Möröy, H. Leighton Grimes

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyT cellNotch signaling pathwayTranscription factorPhenotypeRepressorT-cell receptorNegative selectionCell biologyThymocyteGeneticsCre recombinaseCancer researchTransgeneMolecular biologySignal transductionGeneGenetically modified mouse

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2174 Growth factor independent-1 (Gfi1) is a zinc finger transcriptional repressor protein originally identified in a rodent model of T-cell leukemia. Gfi1 deficient mice have defects in T cell development and a moderate loss of thymic cellularity. In Drosophila, orthologs of Notch1 and Gfi1 cooperate to specify embryo sensory organ precursors. Given the established requirement for Notch1 in T cell specification and development as well as the functional relationship of Notch and Gfi1 orthologs in Drosophila genetics, we investigated the ability of Gfi1 and Notch to cooperate in T-cell development. Utilizing transgenic mice in which the expression of Cre recombinase is controlled by the proximal Lck promoter (LckCre) to both activate intracellular Notch1 (ICN) while simultaneously deleting Gfi1, we demonstrate that T cells overexpressing ICN require Gfi1 for their survival and proper integration of ICN signaling. First, we validated our approach by showing that Lck-Cre-mediated deletion of Gfi1 alleles (Gfi1flox/-) or activation of ICN expression (Rosa26lox-stop-loxICN ires eGFP, “RosaICN”) lead to expected phenotypes. We next examined the consequences of ICN activation with simultaneous deletion of Gfi1. Whereas inducible deletion of Gfi1 alone decreases thymic cellularity by ∼4-fold, Gfi1 deletion coupled with ICN activation leads to complete thymic involution with a 14-fold reduction in total T cell numbers (p<0.0001). To determine whether developmental context controlled this interaction, we used a series of temporally regulated T cell promoters to drive Cre expression. In addition to targeting thymocytes before TCRβ-selection with Lck-Cre, we also examined CD4-Cre (deleting after TCRβ-selection), as well as the distal Lck promoter-Cre (deleting after negative selection). Notably, CD4-Cre mediated activation of ICN and deletion of Gfi1 results in an ∼9-fold reduction in thymocyte numbers, similar to proximal Lck-Cre. However, the requirement for Gfi1 in ICN-expressing cells is not global, in that distal Lck-Cre mediated deletion in post-negative selection thymocytes revealed normal cell numbers. Variation in Notch signaling defects may explain the profound differences in cellularity observed between deleting Gfi1 early verses late in T cell development. We limited one allele of Gfi1 and examined the transcriptional effect upon ICN target genes. First, FACS sorted DN3 thymocytes (CD4−, CD8−, CD44−, CD25+) from proximal LckCre+RosaICNGfi1f/+ transgenic mice, showed that a full one-third of all ICN-activated genes are differentially regulated upon the loss of a single copy of Gfi1. In contrast, splenic T cells from distal Lck-iCre+RosaICNGfi1f/+, display an equivalent expression level of many Notch1 target genes as their Gfi1+/+ littermate controls (dLck-iCre+RosaICNGfi1+/+). Moreover, these Notch signaling defects do not appear to require supraphysiological levels of activated ICN as evidenced by dysregulated endogenous Notch1 target gene activation in Gfi1−/− mice, including FACS sorted DN1 thymocytes and early bone marrow progenitors. Finally, this defect is cell autonomous in that Gfi1−/− early thymic progenitors do not develop on OP9-DL1 stroma cells whereas their WT littermates develop into DN3 T cells within 6 days. Therefore, our data both confirms and extends a functional genetic relationship between Notch1 and Gfi1 from fruit fly to mammalian lymphocyte development. Furthermore, our data suggests that Gfi1−/− developing thymocytes are incapable of correctly interpreting Notch signals, which ultimately leads to their death. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→