Leukemic Stem Cells of Chronic Phase CML Patients Consistently Display Very High BCR-ABL Transcript Levels and Reduced Responsiveness to Imatinib Mesylate in Addition to Generating a Rare Subset That Produce Imatinib Mesylate-Resistant Differentiated Progeny.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Imatinib mesylate (IM) is an inhibitor of the BCR-ABL oncoprotein associated with human chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). IM therapy has shown remarkable effects in initial clinical trials, but both clinical and laboratory studies increasingly suggest that, on its own, IM may have limited curative potential, due to a reduced IM sensitivity of the more primitive, slowly proliferating CD34+ CML cells thought to be responsible for sustaining the disease in vivo. To investigate the basis of this unresponsiveness, we compared the IM sensitivity and BCR-ABL expression of FACS-purified subsets of lin−CD34+ cells from 4 CML chronic phase patients. None of these had been treated with IM and their cells at all stages of differentiation were exclusively leukemic; i.e., >95% of the lin−CD34+CD38−, lin−CD34+CD38+ and lin+CD34− cells were BCR-ABL+ (by direct FISH) and all longterm culture-initiating cell (LTC-IC) -derived CFCs were Ph+. In the absence of IM, suspension cultures initiated with these lin−CD34+CD38− CML cells (0.5–5% of the lin−CD34+ cells) showed a net expansion of viable cells after 3 weeks; 100x with and 10x without added growth factors (GFs). Addition of 0.1–10 μM/ml IM reduced the yield of viable cells in a dose-dependent fashion, particularly when GFs were not added (100-fold decrease with 10 μM/ml IM). Parallel cultures of the corresponding lin−CD34+CD38+ CML cells showed these did not expanded as much (~8x +GFs, 2x -GFs) and were more sensitive to IM (1000-fold decrease after 3 weeks in 10 μM/ml IM -GFs). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis revealed BCR-ABL transcripts to be present in the most primitive, freshly isolated lin−CD34+CD38− cells (n=12) at >300-fold higher levels than in the terminally differentiating lin+CD34− CML cells (n=21), at >10-fold higher levels than the normal BCR transcripts in the same lin−CD34+CD38− cells, and at 40-fold higher levels than in the less primitive lin−CD34+CD38+ cells (n=12), indicating a correlation between decreasing BCR-ABL transcripts and increasing IM sensitivity during CML stem cell differentiation in vivo. Interestingly, maintenance of the lin−CD34+CD38− CML cells for 3 weeks in vitro with 10 μM/ml IM (±GFs) consistently selected for a subset of leukemic cells (80–100% BCR-ABL+ by FISH) that showed complete resistance to 5 μM/ml IM in CFC assays, in marked contrast to the CFCs in the starting lin−CD34+CD38− cells that were inhibited 5–10-fold by 5 μM/ml IM. Moreover, although the Ph was the sole abnormality present in all direct metaphases, initial CFCs and LTC-IC-derived CFCs from all samples, a 17p+ abnormality was seen in 4/4 metaphases obtained from one colony generated from the cells present in one of the 3-week IM-containing cultures, suggesting the selective survival of differentiating progeny of rare, pre-existing, IM-resistant stem cells. Consistent with this possibility was the finding that BCR-ABL transcript levels in the cells present in the 3 week cultures were reduced 50-fold relative to the input lin−CD34+CD38− cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a previously undescribed epigenetic mechanism of IM unresponsiveness characteristic of chronic phase CML stem cells, in addition to the silent accumulation of genetically-determined IM-resistant members as the CML stem cell population expands during the development of the chronic phase of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".