Cosmic footballs from superrotations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Superrotations arise from singular vector fields on the celestial sphere in asymptotically flat space, and their finite integrated versions have been argued by Strominger and Zhiboedov to insert cosmic strings into the spacetime. In this work, we argue for an alternative definition of the action of superrotations on Minkowski space that avoids introducing any defects. This involves realizing the finite superrotation not as a diffeomorphism between spaces, but as a mapping of Minkowski space to itself that may be multivalued or non-surjective. This eliminates any defects in the bulk spacetime at the expense of allowing for defects in the boundary celestial sphere metric. We further explore the geometry of the spatial surfaces in the superrotated spaces, and note that they intersect null infinity at the singularity of the superrotation, causing a breakdown in the large r asymptotic expansion there. To determine how these surfaces embed into Minkowski space, a derivation of the finite superrotation transformation is presented in both Bondi and Newman–Unti gauges. The latter is particularly interesting, since the superrotations are shown to preserve the hyperbolic slicing of Minkowski space in Newman–Unti gauge, and this gauge also provides a means for extending the geometry beyond the Bondi coordinate patch. We argue that the new interpretation for the action of superrotations on spacetime motivates consideration of a wider class of celestial sphere metrics and asymptotic symmetry groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".