MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

690 Ustekinumab Maintained Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease: Results From the IM-UNITI Long-Term Extension

2019· article· en· W2980101599 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce E. Sands, Chenglong Han, Christopher Gasink, Bin Zou, Stephen R. Targan, William J. Sandborn, Brian G. Feagan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUstekinumabQuality of life (healthcare)Crohn's diseaseInternal medicineRegimenPhysical therapyInflammatory bowel diseasePlaceboDiseaseAdalimumabAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The IM-UNITI study evaluated the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) ustekinumab (UST) maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) who completed induction treatment with UST. Previously, we reported the effects of UST on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) through Wk44. Here, we evaluated HRQoL through Wk140 in patients who entered the long-term extension of the IM-UNITI study. METHODS: Patients who completed the safety and efficacy evaluation at Wk 44 of the maintenance study were eligible to continue their regimen in the extension study (placebo [PBO], UST 90 mg q12w, or UST 90 mg q8w). All patients who were treated in the extension study were included in this analysis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and SF-36 data according to the treatment they received during the extension study. The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire with 4 dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function, and social function. The total score ranges from 32 to 224, higher scores indicate better quality of life, and a change ≥16 points was defined as clinically meaningful. For SF-36, a change ≥5 points was defined as clinically meaningful. RESULTS: For patients who entered the extension, mean total IBDQ scores and SF-36 scores at maintenance baseline were comparable across treatment groups (Table 1). Patients who received UST maintained the improvement in IBDQ and SF-36 that was achieved by maintenance baseline through Wk140, and those who received PBO generally worsened. Through Wk 140, 26.5% of patients receiving PBO, 61.5% of patients receiving UST 90 mg q12w, and 59.3% of patients receiving UST 90 mg q8w had ≥16-point improvements from induction baseline in IBDQ score. In addition, 10.9%, 51.6%, and 54.2%, respectively, had ≥5-point improvements in SF-36 physical component summary scores, and 8.7%, 43.8%, and 43.7%, respectively, had ≥5-point improvements in SF-36 mental component summary scores during the same period. CONCLUSION: In patients who entered the long-term extension of the IM-UNITI study, those who received SC UST maintenance generally maintained improvements in IBDQ and SF-36 scores that were achieved through IV induction, and those who received PBO gradually lost these improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→