MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2980110131 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.434.434

A Chromatin Reader That Acts As a Key to Lock in and Coordinate Recruitment of Transcription Factors and a Novel Polycomb Complex to Bivalent Chromatin Thus Driving Formation of Germinal Centers and B-Cell Lymphomas

2015· article· en· W2980110131 on OpenAlexaff
Wendy Béguelin, Matt Teater, Connie M. Corcoran, Michelle Y. Hamline, Randy D. Gascoyne, Ross L. Levine, Omar Abdel‐Wahab, Rita Shaknovich, Olivier Elemento, Vivian J. Bardwell, Ari Melnick

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEZH2ChromatinHistone methyltransferaseConditional gene knockoutBiologyBivalent chromatinPRC2ChromodomainPromoterRepressorBCL6Germinal centerTranscription factorCell biologyGeneticsCancer researchChromatin remodelingGeneB cellGene expressionPhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The EZH2 Polycomb H3K27 histone methyltransferase and the BCL6 transcriptional repressor are highly expressed in germinal center (GC) B cells and are each targeted by activating somatic mutations in DLBCL. In previous work we demonstrated that i) EZH2 is required for GC formation, ii) EZH2 Y641 somatic mutation drives GC hyperplasia and lymphomagenesis and iii) that WT and mutant EZH2 function by creating bivalent chromatin at promoters of genes that regulate cell cycle and terminal differentiation. In other work we showed that BCL6 represses gene promoters specifically by recruiting BCOR complex (a non-canonical form of PRC1 complex); and that BCL6 and EZH2 bind to many of the same promoters, although they do not physically interact. Finally we reported that the presence of both EZH2 and BCL6 was required for BCOR complex to stably associate with chromatin. This led us to hypothesize that BCL6 and EZH2 may be mutually dependent in normal and malignant B-cells. We found that conditional deletion of EZH2 from already established GC B-cells abrogates the ability of constitutive IµBCL6 expression to induce GC hyperplasia. A similar effect was observed by administering the specific EZH2 inhibitor GSK503. For the reciprocal experiments we developed two new mouse models: a conditional BCL6 knockout and a conditional EZH2Y641F knockin in the EZH2 endogenous locus. We showed that EZH2Y641F knockin mice developed GC hyperplasia, but this effect is abrogated by conditional deletion of BCL6 from established GC B cells. Given cell line data suggesting that BCOR might be important for the effect of EZH2 and BCL6 we next generated GC BCOR conditional knockout mice and observed that loss of BCOR not only disrupts GC formation but also abrogates the GC hyperplasia when crossed into the conditional EZH2Y641F knockin mice. Reversal of the EZH2Y641F knockin GC hyperplasia was also achieved by treating these mice with a novel small molecule called 1085 that potently disrupts BCL6 binding to BCOR. Notably, 1085 synergized with EZH2 inhibitors to kill DLBCL cells in vitro and eradicate DLBCL xenografts in vivo. Collectively these data show that EZH2, BCL6 and BCOR are mutually dependent both in the context of the normal GC reaction as well as in the setting of lymphoma precursor lesions driven by constitutive BCL6 expression or mutant EZH2. We next wished to determine the basic mechanism that explains the functional connection between EZH2 and BCL6-BCOR. Using ChIP-seq in primary human GC B cells we showed that there is significant overlap between BCL6-BCOR complex binding with EZH2 and bivalent chromatin. Using ChIP-re-ChIP we found that EZH2, BCOR and BCL6 are all localized to the same chromatin at bivalent gene promoters. Previously we showed that EZH2 mediated H3K27me3 is required for BCOR recruitment. However it was not clear why or how H3K27me3 is important for this effect. We postulated that a histone reader protein might bind to BCOR and recruit it to H3K27me3 marked chromatin. We therefore performed tandem affinity purification of BCOR followed by mass spectrometry to identify putative partner proteins and identified the chromodomain containing protein CBX8 as a novel BCOR partner. Notably CBX8 is the only H3K27 chromodomain protein that is upregulated in GC B cells. We confirmed endogenous BCOR-CBX8 interaction in human DLBCL cells. We showed that CBX8 is recruited to bivalent chromatin in an H3K27me3 dependent manner, and CBX8 depletion results in loss of BCOR complex assemble. Most strikingly, CBX8 knockdown was a phenocopy of EZH2 shRNA or EZH2 inhibitor. CBX8 loss resulted in derepression of EZH2 targets, and phenocopied the effect of EZH2 shRNA or inhibitors (proliferation arrest followed by plasma cell differentiation and then apoptosis). Therefore, CBX8 is shown for the first time to recruit non-canonical PRC1 and to explain how EZH2 cooperates with BCL6 to repress transcription and mediate the GC and DLBCL phenotype. PRC2 functions in a mutually interdependent manner with BCL6 to jointly enable stable association of non-canonical PRC1 complex with bivalent chromatin. In summary, our data establish a paradigm whereby EZH2 functions in a coordinate manner with transcription factors to transiently suppress genes in a cell context-specific manner relevant to its function in normal immunity as well as DLBCL. Our results also provide a rational basis for clinical translation of combined EZH2 and BCL6 inhibitors. Disclosures Levine: Foundation Medicine: Consultancy; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Loxo Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→