MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980121108 · doi:10.1113/ep088056

The effect of dopamine on pulmonary diffusing capacity and capillary blood volume responses to exercise in young healthy humans

2019· article· en· W2980121108 on OpenAlexafffund
Wade W. Michaelchuk, Vincent Tedjasaputra, Tracey L. Bryan, Sean van Diepen, Michael K. Stickland

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsCovenant HealthUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDopamineVasodilationInternal medicineMedicineBlood volumeEndocrinologyPulmonary Diffusing CapacityVascular resistancePlaceboDiffusing capacityCardiologyHemodynamicsAnesthesiaLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the Central question? Does dopamine, a pulmonary vascular vasodilator, contribute to the regulation of pulmonary diffusing capacity and capillary blood volume responses to exercise and exercise tolerance? What are the main findings and their importance? Dopamine appears not to be important for regulating pulmonary diffusing capacity or pulmonary capillary blood volume during exercise in healthy participants. Dopamine blockade trials demonstrated that endogenous dopamine is important for maintaining exercise tolerance; however, exogenous dopamine does not improve exercise tolerance. Abstract Pulmonary capillary blood volume ( V c ) and diffusing membrane capacity ( D m ) expansion are important contributors to the increased pulmonary diffusing capacity (DL CO ) observed during upright exercise. Dopamine is a pulmonary vascular vasodilator, and recent studies suggest that it may play a role in V c regulation through changes in pulmonary vascular tone. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of exogenous dopamine and dopamine receptor‐2 (D 2 ‐receptor) blockade on DL CO , V c and D m at baseline and during cycle exercise, as well as time‐to‐exhaustion at 85% of . We hypothesized that dopamine would increase DL CO , V c , D m and time‐to‐exhaustion, while D 2 ‐receptor blockade would have the opposite effect. We recruited 14 young, healthy, recreationally active subjects ( 45.8 ± 6.6 ml kg −1 min −1 ). DL CO , V c and D m were determined at baseline and during exercise at 60% and 85% of under the following randomly assigned and double blinded conditions: (1) intravenous saline and placebo pill, (2) intravenous dopamine (2 µg kg −1 min −1 ) and placebo pill, and (3) intravenous saline and D 2 ‐receptor antagonist (20 mg oral metoclopramide). Exogenous dopamine and dopamine blockade had no effect on DL CO , V c and D m responses at baseline or during exercise. Dopamine blockade reduced time‐to‐exhaustion by 47% ( P = 0.04), but intravenous dopamine did not improve time‐to‐exhaustion. While dopamine modulation did not affect DL CO , V c or D m , the reduction in time‐to‐exhaustion with D 2 ‐receptor blockade suggests that endogenous dopamine is important for exercise tolerance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207