MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2980164909 · doi:10.1182/blood.v114.22.26.26

In Vitro and In Vivo Mouse Models of the Type 1 Von Willebrand Disease Mutations Y1584C and R1205H.

2009· article· en· W2980164909 on OpenAlexaff
Cynthia M. Pruss, Kate Sponagle, Kimberly Laverty, Carol Hegadorn, Yvette Chirinian, Colleen Notley, Mia Golder, David Lillicrap

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVon Willebrand diseaseRecombinant DNAVon Willebrand factorMolecular biologyADAMTS13In vivoWild typeMissense mutationMutantTransfectionIn vitroChemistryPhenotypeMutationImmunologyBiologyGeneGeneticsBiochemistryPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 26 Introduction: Type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is caused by mutations that result in moderate decreases in VWF (5-50% of normal levels) and a mild bleeding phenotype. The VWF missense mutation Y1584C is associated with mildly decreased VWF:Ag levels, increased ADAMTS13 cleavage, as well as a possible increase in clearance. The Vicenza mutation, R1205H, exhibits a more severe phenotype (VWF:Ag ∼10%), as well as accelerated clearance. However, extensive controlled in vitro and in vivo investigation of these mutations has yet to be described. In this study, we examine both Y1584C and R1205H in comparison to wild type VWF using in vitro and in vivo strategies employing both human and mouse VWF. Methods: Recombinant murine and human VWF and ADAMTS13 were produced via transient transfection in HEK293T cells in serum free OPTIMEM for 72 hours. Full length ADAMTS13 digests were performed in a Tris-Urea system and analyzed via multimer pattern. VWF115 digests were performed in an ELISA based assay. Hydrodynamic injections were performed using 100 μg wild type (WT) or mutant ET-mVWF plasmid DNA in Ringer's solution in 7-9 week old C57Bl6 VWF knockout mice. Mice were sampled at days 2, 5, 8, and then weekly. Mouse plasma was analyzed for CBCs, VWF:Ag, and VWF multimer structure. Results: In the HEK293T transient transfection system, secreted mutant protein was similar to that of wild type recombinant protein, with high molecular weight material present. ADAMTS13 digestion of full length recombinant Y1584C versus wild type showed no statistical difference: 50% cleavage for hVWF WT 1.78U hADAMTS13, hVWF Y1584C 1.67 U, P=0.58; mVWF WT 0.32 U mADAMTS13; Y1584C 0.42 U, P=0.11. In contrast, the Y1584C substitution in the hVWF115 construct required 40% less hADAMTS13 to effect equivalent cleavage (WT 0.087±0.014, 4; Y1584C 0.052±0.005, 8, mean U/ml ADAMTS13±SEM, N, P=0.013). Mouse ADAMTS13 cleavage of mVWF115 was also increased 20% for Y1584C (WT: 0.20±0.06, 4; Y1584C: 0.16±0.01, 4, P=0.014). Hydrodynamic injection caused no adverse events in any animals. CBC values were not statistically significantly different between wild type and mutants. Initial high VWF:Ag values were similar for wild type VWF (25.6±2.9, 15, mean U/ml±SEM, n) and Y1584C (27.2±5.0, 11), but R1205H levels were 36% lower (16.3±2.1, 10). At 14 days, WT VWF:Ag was 5.33±1.13, 15, with R1205H (1.73±0.44, 12) and Y1584C (1.84±0.59, 11) VWF:Ag levels being 68% and 65% lower, respectively. R1205H continued to remain approximately 40% of WT values for the next three weeks, while Y1584C continued to decrease, dropping to 15% on day 21 and 8% on day 28, compared to the wild type values at these time points. The R1205H mutation showed no significant difference in multimer structure defined by observed number of bands (days 2 to 42, mean difference -0.49, P>0.05) to wild type VWF. In contrast, Y1584C had a significant decrease in band number (3.38, P<0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that these two type 1 VWD mutations have a strong observable effect in the VWF knockout mouse model. R1205H exhibits a large decrease in VWF:Ag levels at all measured time points, but no alteration in multimer structure. Y1584C, in contrast, shows a loss of high molecular weight material, and an initially high VWF:Ag level that rapidly decays from day 14 onward, suggesting increased ADAMTS13 cleavage and increased clearance. In addition, in vitro ADAMTS13 testing shows that Y1584C responds differently in the two assay systems with only the VWF115 assay showing significant increases in ADAMTS13-mediated cleavage. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→