MétaCan
Menu
← all works

The Future of OA: A large-scale analysis projecting Open Access publication and readership

2019· preprint· en· 101 citations· W2980172586 on OpenAlex· 10.1101/795310

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Full frame distilled prediction

Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

Candidate categories
Metaresearch, Bibliometrics, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categories
Metaresearch, Bibliometrics, Open science
Domain
Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
Study design
Candidate signal: ObservationalConsensus signal: Observational
Genre
Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score
0.128
Threshold uncertainty score
0.996
Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated · codex-gemma-dda1882f352a

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0280.156
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0220.002
Open science0.0110.012
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.314
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread
0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Summary Understanding the growth of open access (OA) is important for deciding funder policy, subscription allocation, and infrastructure planning. This study analyses the number of papers available as OA over time. The models includes both OA embargo data and the relative growth rates of different OA types over time, based on the OA status of 70 million journal articles published between 1950 and 2019. The study also looks at article usage data, analyzing the proportion of views to OA articles vs views to articles which are closed access. Signal processing techniques are used to model how these viewership patterns change over time. Viewership data is based on 2.8 million uses of the Unpaywall browser extension in July 2019. We found that Green, Gold, and Hybrid papers receive more views than their Closed or Bronze counterparts, particularly Green papers made available within a year of publication. We also found that the proportion of Green, Gold, and Hybrid articles is growing most quickly. In 2019: 31% of all journal articles are available as OA 52% of article views are to OA articles Given existing trends, we estimate that by 2025: 44% of all journal articles will be available as OA 70% of article views will be to OA articles The declining relevance of closed access articles is likely to change the landscape of scholarly communication in the years to come. Percent of views, by OA type: Percent of papers, by OA type:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Field
Decision Sciences
Canadian institutions
OpenAlex
Funders
not available
Keywords
Audience measurementScholarly communicationRelevance (law)Scale (ratio)Library scienceHistoryComputer sciencePolitical scienceGeographyBusinessAdvertisingPublishingCartography
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes