MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

795 Real World Safety of Vedolizumab and Anti-TNF Therapies in Biologic-Naïve Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease Patients: Results From the EVOLVE Study

2019· article· en· W2980178765 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrés Yarur, Gerassimos J. Mantzaris, Uri Kopylov, Marielle Bassel, Neil R. Brett, Trevor Lissoos, Claudia Lopez, Athanasios Natsios, Christina Kifnidi, Sumit Saha, Dirk Demuth, Haridarshan Patel, Brian Bressler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTakeda (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVedolizumabInfliximabAdalimumabUlcerative colitisDiscontinuationInternal medicineHazard ratioAdverse effectIncidence (geometry)GolimumabCertolizumab pegolInflammatory bowel diseaseCrohn's diseaseSurgeryConfidence intervalDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The GEMINI phase III clinical trials showed a favorable safety profile for vedolizumab (VDZ) in treating patients (pts) with moderate-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Real-world studies are needed comparing the safety of VDZ to anti-tumor necrosis factors (anti-TNF) agents in biologic (bio)-naïve pts. METHODS: This was a multi-country (Canada, Greece and the United States) and multi-center, retrospective study including bio-naïve pts (≥18 years old) with ≥6 months follow-up, initiating treatment (Tx) with VDZ or an anti-TNF (adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol) as standard of care between May 2014-March 2018. Data were collected from Tx initiation to earliest of death, chart abstraction date or 6 months post-Tx discontinuation (Canada only). Serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs) (defined as either life threatening, requiring hospital admission, resulting in significant disability/incapacity, or recorded in the chart as an important medical event) occurring from Tx initiation up to five half-lives post-Tx discontinuation were assessed. Incidence rates (per 100 person-years [PYs]) of SAEs and SIs were estimated. A Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for baseline characteristics was used to compare incidence rates between Tx cohorts. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. RESULTS: This study included 1,095 pts (VDZ: 598 [UC: 380; CD: 218]; anti-TNF: 497 [UC: 224; CD: 273]) from 42 sites. Compared to anti-TNF pts, the VDZ cohort were older (mean [SD] age [years]: VDZ, 47.9 [17.4]; anti-TNF, 39.6 [15.2] [ P < 0.01]), were proportionately more male (VDZ, 56.9%; anti-TNF, 49.9% [ P = 0.02]) and had a longer disease duration (median [range: min-max] disease duration [years]: VDZ, 5.0 [0.04– 54.0]; anti-TNF, 2.0 [<0.1–49.0] [ P < 0.01]). Median (range: min-max) follow-up (months) was: VDZ, 15.3 (3.0-47.0); anti-TNF, 16.3 (3.5-51.0). Incidence rates of first occurrence of SAEs and SIs (Table 1) were significantly lower in VDZ versus anti-TNF pts (adjusted HR: SAE, 0.42 [0.27-0.66]; SI, 0.33 [0.18-0.58]). Similar trends were shown when data were stratified by UC and CD, separately (Table 1). CONCLUSION: Bio-naïve pts treated with VDZ were significantly less likely to experience SAEs and SIs than those treated with anti-TNF therapies. These data support a favourable safety profile of VDZ versus anti-TNF in bio-naïve inflammatory bowel disease pts in real-world clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→