MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W29802411

Outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: evolving trends and a focus on fluoroquinolones.

2006· article· en· W29802411 on OpenAlexaff
Anita Carrie, Anita L. Kozyrskyj

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCommunity-acquired pneumoniaPneumoniaObservational studyReceiptEmergency departmentRetrospective cohort studyAntibioticsLogistic regressionPopulationInternal medicineEmergency medicinePediatricsIntensive care medicineEnvironmental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Increasing use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the community, including fluoroquinolones, has been reported, despite concerns for developing antibiotic resistant organisms. Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is commonly treated on an outpatient basis, and recent treatment guidelines suggest only a limited role for fluoroquinolones. OBJECTIVES: To identify evolving trends in the outpatient treatment of CAP in adults, and to identify factors associated with receipt of a fluoroquinolone. METHODS: Retrospective observational design using population-based administrative data. Initial outpatient treatment for subjects diagnosed with CAP between May 1996 and March 2002 was examined. Logistic regression was used to examine the influence of patient characteristics on the receipt of a fluoroquinolone. RESULTS: A total of 31,940 outpatients with CAP were identified. The proportion of patients receiving fluoroquinolones increased from 6.6% in 1996/97 to 25.2% in 2001/02. Over the course of the study, 158 (25.9%) of the 610 patients meeting the eligibility criteria for treatment with fluoroquinolones, according to treatment guidelines, received these agents. Of the 31,330 subjects who did not meet the eligibility criterion, 3,886 (12.4%) received a fluoroquinolone. Other variables that influenced the receipt of a fluoroquinolone included: age (for every 10-year increase) [OR=1.16 (1.14-1.19)], urban residence [OR=1.40 (1.30-1.51)], presentation to an emergency department [OR=0.80 (0.70-0.90)], high-level drug use (six or more different drugs in the previous year) [OR=1.50 (1.41-1.59)], and income-level (highest to lowest) [OR=1.20 (1.08-1.35)]. CONCLUSION: The use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of CAP is increasing. However less than 4% of the subjects receiving fluoroquinolones met eligibility requirements according to treatment guidelines. Initiatives to increase the uptake of treatment guidelines appear warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207