The presence of <i>Aspergillus fumigatus</i> in asthmatic airways is not clearly related to clinical disease severity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is suggested that airway fungi, in particular Aspergillus may impinge on clinical phenotype in asthma. Indeed, the term severe asthma with fungal sensitization (SAFS) has been coined. We aimed to ascertain whether the presence of fungi, in particular Aspergillus fumigatus, in the airway correlated with asthma severity and control. Furthermore, we aimed to determine whether traditional markers of Aspergillus sensitization related to the presence of Aspergillus within the airway. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients characterized by asthma severity (GINA) and level of control (ACQ-7) underwent bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Serum was assessed for A fumigatus-specific IgE and total IgE. Galactomannan and relevant cytokine levels were assessed in serum, plasma and BAL. BAL was analyzed for the presence of A fumigatus. RESULTS: In BAL, fungi were visible by microscopy in 70% and present by qPCR in 86% of patients, while A fumigatus was detectable by qPCR in 46%. Plasma and BAL IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13 and TNF-α correlated with BAL fungal presence, while plasma IL-17 correlated with BAL fungal presence. Aspergillus positive BAL correlated with increased plasma and BAL IL-6 and BAL IL-13. There was no relationship between fungal airway presence and steroid dose, asthma severity or control. The presence of Aspergillus within the airway did not relate to serum IgE positivity for Aspergillus. CONCLUSIONS: Fungi were present in a large proportion of our asthmatic patients' airways, but their presence was not predicted by traditional markers of sensitization, nor did it appear to be related to measures of disease severity or control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".