DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECONOMIC SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DOCTRINE IN THE WORKS OF MUSA AKIEGETZADEH AND USE OF ITS PROVISIONS IN DEVELOPMENT OF STATE REGULATION MEASURES FOR MULTIPOLAR ECONOMY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Development of the Russian economy is accompanied by qualitative changes in the ethnonational sphere, what is manifested in the growth of the scales of integration processes, formation of interethnic and supranational regional civilizational communities and megaethnoses. The objective basis for these changes lies in the material and spiritual culture of peoples, but, as the practice of ethnonational relations shows, they come in a contradictory and painful way, what makes it necessary to take them into account when forming measures for state regulation of the economy. At present, Russian society needs a new scientific paradigm reflecting the positive direction of development of national relations in the country and taking into account the experience of centuries-old cooperation between nations and peoples. The article presents an analysis of the main provisions and conclusions contained in the works of Moussa Akiegetzadeh, the creator of the first major art work in the Tatar language of the last quarter of the 19th century and the founder of the system of economic views, in which the achievements of world and Russian economic science, as well as Islamic traditions were synthesized, and popularizer of these ideas in the Ottoman Empire in the era of Mesrutiat (Parliamentarism) and the following years. The thesis is substantiated, according to which historical and economic knowledge acts as one of the sources for elaboration of the program documents of the Russian state in formation of regional development targets; the possibility of their realization is being determined by complete inclusion of the totality of cultural, historical, social, religious features of territorial entities
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".