MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980330033 · doi:10.14740/cii.v4i2.90

Chlorhexidine Vaginal Cleansing Versus Iodine Prior to Cesarean Section and the Rate of Postoperative Maternal Infection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2019· article· en· W2980330033 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamad K. Ramadan, Zeinab Maita, Rana El-Tal, Manal Hubeish

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infection and Immunity · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical site infection prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChlorhexidineEndometritisAntisepticRandomized controlled trialAntibiotic prophylaxisPregnancySurgeryAntibioticsDentistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cesarean delivery is the most common major surgical procedure done by obstetricians. The rate of post-cesarean infectious morbidities is still unacceptably high despite the preoperative skin preparation and antibiotic use. There is evidence that vaginal cleansing prior to cesarean delivery decreases the risk of maternal infectious morbidities. This evidence, however, does not guide to the choice of the optimal antiseptic agent. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of abdominal and vaginal preparation with chlorhexidine compared to povidone-iodine prior to cesarean delivery in the reduction of post-cesarean infectious morbidities. Methods: This was a single-center randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to preoperative vaginal and skin preparation with either chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine in addition to the standard preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative infectious morbidity (fever, endometritis and wound infection) occurring within 30 days of the cesarean delivery. Results: In the period from February 2018 through February 2019, a total of 333 patients were recruited; 159 patients were assigned to chlorhexidine group and 174 to povidone-iodine group. Clinically there was a higher reduction of composite infectious morbidity in the group receiving chlorhexidine preparation when compared to povidone-iodine group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (7 (4.4%) vs. 14 (8.0%) respectively, P = 0.17). Nonetheless, a significant difference could be elicited in less number of clinic follow-up visits with the use of chlorhexidine. Conclusion: The frequency of postpartum infectious morbidity in the entire cohort was lower than expected. This might be the effect of vaginal cleansing (irrespective of the antiseptic used). The use of chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine for combined abdominal and vaginal preparation was not different in reducing post-cesarean infectious morbidities. Clin Infect Immun. 2019;4(2):21-26 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cii90

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infection and ImmunitySame topicSurgical site infection preventionFrench-language works237,207