Contrasting patterns of post‐fledging movements of two sympatric warbler species with different life‐history strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Broad‐scale movements of migrant songbirds during the post‐fledging period are hypothesized to aid in the development of navigational abilities, to allow individuals to prospect for future breeding territories (combined as regional exploration), or as representing the commencement of migration. Using an automated radio telemetry array, we compared broad‐scale post‐fledging movements of hatch‐year individuals from two closely related species: blackpoll warblers Setophaga striata and myrtle warblers Setophaga coronata coronata . These two species have contrasting migratory strategies (long‐distance vs short‐distance), and we studied populations from two different islands in Nova Scotia that have different geographical landscape features. Locally‐hatched individuals affixed with VHF radios in August were tracked throughout the Gulf of Maine region for up to 2.5 months after tagging. Departure date and direction, daily probability of initiating a flight, daily displacement, total displacement and net displacement were assessed to see if there was support for the commencement of migration or regional exploration hypotheses. We observed differences between both species and islands. Compared to blackpolls, myrtles departed later, had more variable timings and directions of departure, made fewer regional‐scale flights, were more directional in their movements, and had higher net displacement. Total displacement and daily flight distances were similar between species. Variability of departure behaviour of myrtles was observed on the island farther from the mainland and both species made longer flights from that island. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that hatch‐year blackpoll movements are a form of regional exploration and hatch‐year myrtle movements represent the initial stages of migration. Species differences may be related to migratory strategy (long‐distance vs short‐distance), where the need to acquire information during post‐fledging for navigational purposes is higher for blackpolls than myrtles. Island differences suggest that habitat quality and ecological barriers influence broad‐scale movements, and myrtles are more facultative in their behaviour than blackpolls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".