MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980384056 · doi:10.1113/ep088072

Nicotinic receptors modulate skin perfusion during normothermia, and have a limited role in skin vasodilatation and sweating during hyperthermia

2019· article· en· W2980384056 on OpenAlexaff
Naoto Fujii, Tatsuro Amano, Glen P. Kenny, Yasushi Honda, Narihiko Kondo, Takeshi Nishiyasu

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasodilationHyperthermiaPerfusionMedicineNicotinic agonistPharmacologyReceptorThermoregulationAnesthesiaChemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? What is the role of nicotinic receptors in the regulation of normothermic cutaneous blood flow and cutaneous vasodilatation and sweating during whole-body heating induced following resting in a non-heat-stress condition? What is the main finding and its importance? Nicotinic receptors modulated cutaneous vascular tone during rest in a non-heat-stress condition and in the early stage of heating, but they had a limited role in mediating cutaneous vasodilatation when core temperature increased >0.4°C. Further, the contribution of nicotinic receptors to sweating was negligible during whole-body heating. Our findings provide new insights into the role of nicotinic receptors in end-organ function of skin vasculature and sweat glands in humans. ABSTRACT: Nicotinic receptors are present in human skin including cutaneous vessels and eccrine sweat glands as well as peripheral nerves. We tested the hypothesis that nicotinic receptors do not contribute to the control of cutaneous vascular tone in the normothermic state, but are involved in mediating cutaneous vasodilatation and sweating during a whole-body passive heat stress in humans. We first performed a nicotinic receptor blocker verification protocol in six young adults (one female) wherein increases in cutaneous vascular conductance and sweating elicited by 10 mm nicotine were blocked by administration of 500 µm hexamethonium to confirm effective blockade. Thereafter, 12 young males participated in a passive heating protocol. After an instrumentation period in a non-heat-stress condition, participants rested for a 10 min baseline period. Thereafter, oesophageal temperature was increased by 1.0°C using water-perfusion suits. Cutaneous vascular conductance, sweat rate, active sweat gland density and sweat output per individual gland were assessed with and without 500 µm hexamethonium administered via intradermal microdialysis. Hexamethonium reduced cutaneous vascular conductance by 22-34% during normothermia and the early stage of heating. However, this effect was diminished as oesophageal temperature increased >0.4°C. Active sweat gland density was reduced by hexamethonium when oesophageal temperature was elevated by 0.4-0.6°C above baseline resting. However, this was paralleled by a marginal increase in sweat gland output. Consequently, sweat rate remained unchanged. We showed that nicotinic receptors modulate cutaneous perfusion during normothermia and the early stage of heating, but not when core temperature increases >0.4°C. Additionally, they play a limited role in mediating sweating during heating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyFrench-language works237,207