MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980513812 · doi:10.1161/res.125.suppl_1.111

Abstract 111: Wnt Signaling Inhibition Rescues Voltage-Gated Na <sup>+</sup> Current in Brugada Syndrome Patient Cardiomyocytes

2019· article· en· W2980513812 on OpenAlexaff
Wenbin Liang, Aizhu Lu, Cencen Chu, Jerry Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWnt signaling pathwayBrugada syndromeCell biologySignal transductionInternal medicineEndocrinologyGene knockdownMedicineChemistryBiologyCell cultureGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: Both inherited arrhythmogenic diseases (such as Brugada Syndrome) and heart failure are associated with reduced voltage-gated Na + current (I Na ) which promotes lethal arrhythmias and sudden deaths. We and others have shown that Wnt/β-catenin signaling (Wnt signaling), which is active in heart disease, inhibits I Na in rat and mouse cardiomyocytes. But whether Wnt signaling regulates I Na in human cardiomyocytes and represents a novel therapeutic target is unknown. This study aims to investigate if Wnt signaling inhibits I Na in human cardiomyocytes, to elucidate the underlying mechanisms, and to test if blocking Wnt signaling can rescue I Na in Brugada Syndrome patient cardiomyocytes. Methods and Results: Cardiomyocytes were differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC-CMs) that were derived from healthy volunteers or a Brugada Syndrome patient. Whole-cell patch-clamp technique was used for I Na measurement. Activation of Wnt signaling in healthy hiPSC-CMs led to a 69% reduction in I Na amplitude (peak current at -20 mV: -10.5±2.8 pA/pF, n=9 cells vs. control -33.6±4.1 pA/pF, n=6 cells, p<0.01) by reducing SCN5A mRNA (encoding the pore-forming α subunit of I Na , Na v 1.5). In addition, Wnt signaling also reduced Na v 1.5 glycosylation causing a depolarizing shift of I Na activation curve (a mechanism found in human, but not in rodent, cardiomyocytes). Blocking Wnt signaling in Brugada hiPSC-CMs with shRNA-mediated β-catenin knockdown led to a 13-fold increase in I Na amplitude (p<0.01, n=9 cells), offsetting the fundamental genetic defect. Consistent with increased I Na, blocking Wnt signaling also upregulated SCN5A mRNA and Na v 1.5 protein, without affecting expression of other cardiac ion channels in Brugada hiPSC-CMs. Conclusions: This study demonstrated Wnt-inhibition of human cardiac I Na and, using Brugada Syndrome as an example, demonstrated that blocking Wnt signaling is a novel therapeutic strategy to rescue I Na in heart disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation ResearchSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207