Triumph and Tragedy Associated with Aboriginal Self Governments in Canada: the Cases of the James Bay, Nisga’a, Nunavut and Tsilhqot’in People(s)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada’s current population presents a complex mosaic of citizens each belonging to rich and unique cultural, religious, social, and ethnic groups. Urban centres like Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver are activity-rich hubs of people from a variety of different backgrounds. While the concept of Canada as being a cultural assortment is relatively modern, there are faces in the national crowd that belong to a long-standing group of marginalized peoples – Canada’s aboriginal population. The Aboriginal people of Canada have resided in the nation’s regions long before the official creation of the country itself. Moreover, they have been operating within established, organized societies and communities well before the assertion and acquisition of sovereignty by the Crown as well as prior to the establishment of settler societies and governments (Luk). As such, the Aboriginal people of Canada have been part of a long and gruelling process to attain varying levels of self-government in the fight to gain back their rights as individuals and as a distinct Aboriginal nation.[...]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.080 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".