Comparison of the effects of surface plasmon resonance and the transverse magneto-optic Kerr effect in magneto-optic plasmonic nanostructures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this letter, we report on the response of surface plasmon resonance (SPR, reflectance versus incident angle) and transverse magneto-optic Kerr effect (T-MOKE) versus incident angle) in two different magneto-optic-plasmonic (MOP) configurations: Ti/Au/Co/Au (Configuration A) and Ti/Ag/Co/Au (Configuration B) at the excitation wavelength of 780 nm in air. Configuration A includes a 35 nm Au layer and Configuration B includes a 35 nm Ag layer. Both configurations consist of a thin (4 or 8 nm) Co magneto-optic layer and showed an enhancement of the T-MOKE signal over the SPR signal. Configuration B showed higher SPR and T-MOKE responses over Configuration A, possibly due to the low loss and higher plasmonic properties of Ag over Au. The T-MOKE based sensor shows improvements in quality factor by over two times compared to that of SPR. The magneto-optic SPR sensitivity of the sensor obtained shows an improvement by three times over the SPR sensitivity, and this can be further improved by suitably modifying the configuration. These results are of importance to the development of enhanced MOP/plasmonic sensors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".