MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2980698697 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.3911

P4‐248: EVALUATING SHARED GENETIC LIABILITY FOR LATE‐LIFE ABNORMAL THOUGHTS AND PERCEPTION (MILD BEHAVIORAL IMPAIRMENT), AND NEUROLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC CONDITIONS

2019· article· en· W2980698697 on OpenAlexaff
Byron Creese, Helen Brooker, Anne Corbett, Zahinoor Ismail, Dag Aarsland, Clive Ballard

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)DementiaContext (archaeology)Clinical psychologyDiseasePsychiatryPopulationPsychosisChecklistAssociation (psychology)PerceptionMedicineInternal medicineNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mild Behavioral Impairment (MBI) is a neurobehavioral syndrome characterized by often subtle neuropsychiatric changes which emerge later in life and are not attributable to preexisting psychiatric conditions. MBI is associated with an increased risk of dementia both in the context of MCI and in cognitively normal older adults. The emergence of subtle changes to thoughts (e.g. persecutory delusions) and perception (e.g. visual hallucinations) in cognitively normal older adults is a particularly interesting cluster of MBI symptoms. However, whether and to what extent they represent a prodromal neurodegenerative disease state is unknown. In this exploratory analysis we examine whether these ‘symptoms’ in the cognitively normal population are genetically related to major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia (SCZ) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Abnormal thoughts and perception were rated using the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C) in a sample of 3,152 PROTECT study participants who had also provided a DNA sample. Publicly available summary statistics for MDD, SCZ and Alzheimer's disease were used for genetic comparisons. Polygenic risk scores were generated for AD, MDD and SCZ and tested for association with the MBI-C ratings. LD Score Regression was used to estimate the genetic correlation between each clinical condition and MBI-C ratings. 123 people reported having abnormal thoughts and perception items as rated by the MBI-C. There was a significant association between abnormal thoughts and perception and schizophrenia polygenic score (OR 1.4[95% CI: 1.15-1.65], p=0.0005, R=0.015) and there was modest evidence of genetic correlation between these two phenotypes (rg=0.22, p=0.08). There was no evidence of association in any of the other comparisons. These findings suggest that, while associated with higher risk of conversion to dementia in clinical populations, the genetic etiology of abnormal thoughts and perception in preclinical populations is more closely related to schizophrenia than Alzheimer's disease. This study is a relatively small sample and more data will be needed to confirm these findings, particularly for the LD score regression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→