MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980718230 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2019-0167

Bio-Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-MNPs catalyzed green synthesis of pyrrolo[2,1-<i>a</i>]isoquinoline derivatives using isoquinolium bromide salts: study of antioxidant activity

2019· article· en· W2980718230 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maryam Abbasi, Fariba Zamani Hargalani, Siavash Afrashteh, Rezvaneh Rostamian

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Characterization of Pyrroles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryIsoquinolineFerricDPPHCatalysisOrganic chemistryButylated hydroxytolueneBromideNuclear chemistryAntioxidant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, a novel, one-pot, efficient procedure with high yield for the synthesis of pyrrolo[2,1-a]isoquinoline derivatives using multi-component reaction of isoquinoline, alkyl bromides, and triphenylphosphine in the presence of Fe3O4-MNPs as catalyst under solvent-free conditions at room temperature is investigated. This study highlights an easy, simple, rapid, and clean method for the preparation of pyrrolo[2,1-a]isoquinoline derivatives. The Fe3O4-MNPs in these reactions were produced employing a green procedure by reduction of ferric chloride solution with pomegranate peel water extract. Additionally, antioxidant activity was studied for the some newly synthesized compounds such as 5a–5d using the DPPH radical trapping and reducing potential of ferric ion experiments and comparing the results with the results of synthetic antioxidants (2-tert-butylhydroquinone, TBHQ; butylated hydroxytoluene, BHT). As a result, compounds 5a–5d show trace DPPH radical trapping and excellent reducing power of ferric ion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and Characterization of PyrrolesFrench-language works237,207