Bacterial survival in whole blood depends on plasma sensitivity and resistance to neutrophil killing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whole blood (WB) is held at room temperature for not more than 24 hours before blood component manufacturing. The ability of several culture collection, skin-derived, and transfusion-related bacteria to survive in WB stored at 22 ± 2°C for 24 hours was investigated in this study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-one bacteria of the species Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus capitis, Streptococcus agalactiae, Serratia liquefaciens, Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Yersinia enterocolitica were inoculated into 7-mL aliquots of WB at a concentration of 500 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. Spiked WB was stored aerobically at 22 ± 2°C, and bacterial viability and growth were monitored at 3, 8, and 24 hours during WB storage. Bacteria that showed decreased viability during WB incubation were further characterized for their sensitivity to plasma factors and neutrophil killing. RESULTS: There were three different scenarios for bacterial behavior during the hold of WB at 22 ± 2°C. Five bacteria proliferated (p < 0.03), 11 remained viable or showed low proliferation, and a third group of five bacteria had decreased or lost viability (p < 0.01). Three of the latter five bacteria were plasma-sensitive while the other two were plasma-resistant but susceptible to neutrophil killing (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The bactericidal activity of WB can be the result of plasma sensitivity or neutrophil killing. Bacteria with a starting inoculum of 500 CFU/mL, and able to resist WB immune factors, can proliferate to clinically significant levels posing a potential safety risk to transfusion patients. Results of this pilot study should be validated under standard WB collection and storage conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".