MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980798924 · doi:10.1161/res.125.suppl_1.282

Abstract 282: Mitochondrial Complex I Induced Myocardial Stunning Following Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

2019· article· en· W2980798924 on OpenAlexaff
Lin Piao, Yong‐Hu Fang, Robert B. Hamanaka, Gökhan M. Mutlu, Cameron Dezfulian, Stephen L. Archer, Willard W. Sharp

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyocardial stunningMedicineCardiogenic shockCardiopulmonary resuscitationInternal medicineCardiologyResuscitationPathophysiologyMitochondrial permeability transition poreReactive oxygen speciesShock (circulatory)MitochondrionStunningAnesthesiaIschemiaMyocardial infarctionApoptosisProgrammed cell deathBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cardiogenic shock following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for sudden cardiac arrest is common, occurring even in the absence of acute coronary artery occlusion, and contributes to high rates of post-CPR mortality. The pathophysiology of this shock is unclear and effective therapies for improving clinical outcomes are lacking. Methods and Results: Using a murine model of asystolic cardiac arrest, we investigated the pathophysiology of post-CPR cardiogenic shock and discovered that duration of cardiac arrest (4, 8, 12 or 16-minute) prior to CPR determined post-resuscitation success rates, degree of neurological injury, and severity of myocardial dysfunction. Post-CPR cardiac dysfunction was not associated with myocardial necrosis, apoptosis, inflammation, or mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening and recovered within several days, indicative of myocardial stunning. Post-CPR myocardial stunning was associated with increases in ventricular and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS, P <0.001 vs Sham, respectively). Seahorse micropolarimetry of isolated post-CPR cardiac mitochondria revealed decreased rates of maximal oxygen consumption rates (OCR) for both Complex I and Complex II vs controls ( P <0.01 vs Sham, respectively), indicating inhibition of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Paradoxically, in the presence of ADP stimulated coupled respiration, post-CRP mitochondria demonstrated increased OCR ( P <0.05 vs Sham) and increased rates of proton leak ( P <0.05 vs Sham), suggesting Complex I as the site of ROS generation. These findings were not observed at complex II. S1QEL, a complex I-specific superoxide inhibitor, administered during CPR, decreased myocardial ROS generation while improving post-CPR myocardial function ( P <0.01 vs CPR control), neurological injury ( P <0.01 vs CPR control), and survival ( P <0.01 vs CPR control). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that cardiogenic shock following resuscitation from cardiac arrest is consistent with myocardial stunning mediated by mitochondrial complex I injury and ROS generation. Targeting this mechanism represents a novel and practical therapy for improving sudden cardiac arrest resuscitation outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation ResearchSame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207