MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980799715 · doi:10.1161/res.125.suppl_1.407

Abstract 407: Modeling Atrial Fibrillation in a Dish Using Atrial iPSC Derived Cardiomyocytes

2019· article· en· W2980799715 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Hong, Meihong Zhang, Seock‐Won Youn, Erin Lambers, Arvind Sridhar, Ambili Menon, Brandon Chalazan, Joseph C. Wu, Jalees Rehman, Dawood Darbar

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMexiletineInduced pluripotent stem cellAtrial fibrillationRanolazineAtrial action potentialCardiologyElectrophysiologyMedicineInternal medicineSodium channelGatingAtrium (architecture)BiologyRepolarizationChemistryGeneGeneticsSodiumEmbryonic stem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mutations in multiple genes have been linked with familial atrial fibrillation (AF) but the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for therapy remain poorly understood. To characterize the electrophysiological phenotype of an AF-linked SCN5A mutation and assess novel mechanism-based therapies, we generated patient-specific atrial induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) from a carrier with an SCN5A-E428K mutation and an unaffected family member using a differentiation protocol optimized for atrial differentiation generated atrial iPSC-CMs. The atrial iPSC-CMs carrying SCN5A-E428K displayed increased window and late Na+ current (INa,L), increased beating frequency and irregularity with triggered beats and prolongation of the action potential duration (APD) versus control atrial iPSC-CMs. The multi-electrode array (MEA) recordings of mutant atrial iPSC-CMs showed spontaneous arrhythmogenic activity with beat-to-beat irregularity. We further showed that targeted inhibition of the INa,L with ranolazine normalized the aberrant electrophysiologic phenotype in the SCN5A-E428K atrial iPSC-CMs and mexiletine reversed the sodium channel gating defects, and reduced beating frequency and irregularity. Our study illustrates the potential use of atrial iPSC-CMs for modeling AF in a dish, elucidating the underlying cellular mechanisms, and identifying novel mechanism-based therapies custom-tailored for individual patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation ResearchSame topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207