Pneumatosis Intestinalis and Its Association With Lung Transplant: Alberta Experience.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the incidence, clinical presentation, laboratory findings, possible causes, and outcomes associated with pneumatosis intestinalis in the setting of lung transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A departmental database showed that, between October 2002 and August 2013, our institution performed 373 lung transplants. The database was queried for all patients who had pneumatosis intestinalis and/or pneumoperitoneum after lung transplant at our institution. For this retrospective chart review, information collected included demographics, baseline variables, symptoms, signs, laboratory parameters, radiologic work-up, medications, including immunosuppressants at presentation, progress and time to resolution, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications, as well as short-term and midterm outcomes (up to 1 year). RESULTS: The incidence of pneumatosis intestinalis was 2.68% (10/373 patients). Mean age of patients was 52.2 years (range, 34.9-67.9 y). Mean time for development of pneumatosis intestinalis after transplant was 352.8 days (range, 5-2495 d). Abdominal symptoms and signs were present in 6 patients (60%). The large bowel was the site of involvement in all but 1 patient, with predilection for ascending colon (80%) and transverse colon (90%) in most patients. High serum lactate levels were found in 2 patients, and both underwent bowel resection, with surgical specimens revealing evidence of ischemic changes in the gut. Mean dose of prednisone was 22 mg at the time of presentation (range, 0-60 mg). Mean hospital length of stay was 16.9 days (range, 0-40 d). Short-term survival was 100%. Midterm survival at the end of 1 year was 80%. Mean time for pneumatosis to resolve was 18 days (range, 14-35 d). CONCLUSIONS: Pneumatosis intestinalis in bilateral lung transplant recipients can be treated with a minimal amount of imaging, and most patients can be treated conservatively. Survival outcomes are quite good, with 100% during the short term and 80% at 1 year in our series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".