Estimation of the contributions of conductance and electric field to the intensity of field-aligned currents in the night polar ionosphere during substorm expansion phase
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the output data of the magnetogram inversion technique, we analyze the dynamics of the Pedersen ionospheric currents and field-aligned currents (FACs) in the night mesoscale cells of the three main large-scale Iijima and Potemra Regions (R1, R2 and R0) during the expansion phase of the summer and winter substorms. FACs play a key role in the ionosphere-magnetosphere interaction. The continuity equation for the electric current density contains two types of possible feedback within the electric circuit parts that connect Pedersen currents and FACs in each cell. Pedersen ionospheric conductivity is dominant to Type 1, and the electric field dominates in Type 2 feedback. This paper studies both types of physical feedback in mesoscale cells of downward and upward FACs on the night side of the polar ionosphere from the data of two selected substorms of the summer and winter seasons in the northern hemisphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it