MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2980922533 · doi:10.33879/amh.2019.1834

Assessment of Cognitive Impairment in Geriatrics Outpatient Clinics–Achieving Standards of Care

2019· article· en· W2980922533 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lih Vei Onn, Shyh Poh Teo

Bibliographic record

VenueAging Medicine and Healthcare · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaMedicineGeriatricsOutpatient clinicActivities of daily livingDonepezilCognitionGerontologyMemory clinicDiseaseMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dementia involves progressive structural changes to the brain, causing cognitive deficits in multiple domains.These impair a person's capacity to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs), which has widespread implications affecting the individual, families and their communities.In the Asia-Pacific, dementia is a rising concern, especially with the predicted exponential increase in older people that will develop dementia.1 There is no baseline data on dementia prevalence in Brunei.However, based on the Alzheimer's Disease International report on dementia in the Asia-Pacific Region, it is estimated there is up to 2,000 people with dementia, most of which may be undiagnosed.2 However, risk factors for dementia such as smoking, diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia are prevalent.3 It is likely that many cases remain undiagnosed, with delayed presentations to clinicians.Early diagnosis and appropriate assessment of people ABSTRACT Background/Purpose: Dementia is predicted to increase exponentially in the Asia-Pacific.A general approach and quality standards are expected in an outpatient clinic when people present with cognitive complaints.The quality of dementia assessment in a geriatrics outpatient clinic was audited against locally developed standards for dementia diagnosis and assessment.Methods: Standards included timely specialist review, blood tests and brain imaging, documented diagnosis including subtype and severity if dementia, behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and safety risk with activities of daily living including occupation, driving, cooking, finances and medications, and offer acetylcholinesterase inhibitors if indicated and cognitive stimulation therapy (CST).Data was obtained retrospectively from electronic records for a year.Results: Among the 43 new referrals for cognitive impairment, 70% had dementia.Overall, patients referred for cognitive impairment are seen in a timely manner, with high compliance for completing appropriate blood tests and brain imaging requests.Conclusion: Specific details regarding dementia such as subtype and complications such as BPSD could be improved.More proactive referrals to support services and CST are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.403 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAging Medicine and Healthcare→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→