MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980942118 · doi:10.1002/pbc.28031

The ganglioside G<sub>D2</sub> as a circulating tumor biomarker for neuroblastoma

2019· article· en· W2980942118 on OpenAlexaff
Frank M. Balis, Christine M. Busch, Ami V. Desai, Emily Hibbitts, Arlene Naranjo, Rochelle Bagatell, Meredith S. Irwin, Elizabeth Fox

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsNeuroblastomaGanglioneuroblastomaMedicineBiomarkerStage (stratigraphy)GanglioneuromaInternal medicineOncologyGastroenterologyCancer researchPathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background G D2 is a ganglioside that is ubiquitously expressed in the plasma membrane of neuroblastoma and is shed into the circulation. Procedure G D2 was measured with a high‐pressure liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay in serum or plasma from 40 children without cancer (controls) and in biobanked samples from 128 (73 high‐risk) children with neuroblastic tumors at diagnosis, 56 children with relapsed neuroblastoma, 14 children with high‐risk neuroblastoma after treatment, and 8 to 12 children each with 10 other common childhood cancers at diagnosis. Results The C 18 (18 carbon fatty acid) lipoform was the predominant circulating form of G D2 in controls and in patients with neuroblastoma. The median concentration of G D2 in children with high‐risk neuroblastoma at diagnosis was 167 nM (range, 16.1‐1060 nM), which was 30‐fold higher than the median concentration (5.6 nM) in controls. G D2 was not elevated in serum from children with the differentiated neuroblastic tumors, ganglioneuroma ( n = 10) and ganglioneuroblastoma‐intermixed subtype ( n = 12), and in children with 10 other childhood cancers. G D2 concentrations were significantly higher in serum from children with MYCN ‐amplified tumors ( P = 0.0088), high‐risk tumors ( P &lt; 0.00001), International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) stage 4 tumors ( P &lt; 0.00001), and in children who died ( P = 0.034). Conclusions Circulating G D2 appears to be a specific and sensitive tumor biomarker for high‐risk/high‐stage neuroblastoma and may prove to be clinically useful as a diagnostic or prognostic circulating tumor biomarker. G D2 will be measured prospectively and longitudinally in children enrolled on a high‐risk neuroblastoma treatment trial to assess its ability to measure response to treatment and predict survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Blood & CancerSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207