Tunable All-Fiber Laser for Remote Sensing of Methane Near 3.4 μm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mid-infrared (MIR) region of the optical spectrum has drawn considerable scientific interest in the past few years. Indeed, several molecules relevant to medical or environmental conundrums exhibit strong absorption lines in this region: for instance, methane lines in the MIR are up to 100 times stronger than in the near-infrared [1]. In turn, fiber lasers have long stood as prime candidates for remote gas detection in outdoor environments, given their exemplary robustness, power scaling and beam quality. However, while several previous contributions have targeted methane bands under 3.3 μm in wavelength [2], little work has been done to push fiber laser detection tools past 3.4 μm, where methane absorption lines are mostly decoupled from the absorption spectra of water and other atmospheric constituents. This is especially relevant when probing CH <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">4</sub> through a gas mixture with relatively high water content, such as when studying gas emission from methane-rich thermokarst lakes in northern regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".