MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2980978508 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.3437

P3‐403: CLINICAL AND IMAGING CHARACTERISTICS OF NONHYPERTENSIVE CEREBRAL SMALL VESSEL DISEASE

2019· article· en· W2980978508 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jae‐Sung Lim, Keon‐Joo Lee, Beom Joon Kim, Hee‐Joon Bae

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyStroke (engine)Internal medicineBlood pressureLeft ventricular hypertrophyDiabetes mellitusDementiaAtrial fibrillationOutpatient clinicProspective cohort studyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small vessel disease (SVD) affects cognitive function in not only vascular cognitive impairment but also neurodegenerative dementia. Hypertension is one of the most important determinants of SVD. A significant number of patients develop SVD regardless of hypertension. However, it is not well known about the distribution, severity, and clinical impact of SVD in patients without hypertension. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of non-hypertensive SVD. This is a single-center prospective observational study with nested case-control design. Using a prospective stroke registry, non-hypertension was defined as meeting all the following criteria: i) no history of hypertension prior to stroke, ii) no antihypertensive medication before admission, at discharge, and during outpatient care until one year from stroke onset, iii) mean systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg from 4 days after hospitalization to discharge, and iv) no left ventricular hypertrophy in electrocardiography. Hypertension was defined as the case in which an antihypertensive drug was prescribed in a past medical history or was administered at discharge. The hypertensive controls were matched with non-hypertensive cases using age and sex as matching variables (1:1 exact match). SVD was defined according to STRIVE criteria. SVD lesions were registered on the Montreal Neurological Institute templates, and lesion frequency map was reconstructed using in-house MATLAB code. Characteristic patterns of SVD distribution explored by comparisons between cases and controls. A total of 704 subjects were included, and mean age was 68.9±10.7 years. In the hypertensive group, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and antithrombotic agents use was significantly higher than the non-hypertensive group. In the non-hypertensive group, white matter hyperintensities lesion map revealed that the anterior temporal and inferior frontal areas were more frequently involved, and cerebral microbleeds were more frequently observed in the occipital cortex. In the case of lacunar infarction, the non-hypertensive group had fewer lesions in brainstem. We will investigate the interrelationships between these image factors and cognitive functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→