MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980994035

Jewellery and Nail Polish Worn by Health Care Workers and the Risk of Infection Transmission: A Review of Clinical Evidence and Guidelines

2017· review· en· W2980994035 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Cimon, Robin Featherstone

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHygieneMedicineInfection controlTransmission (telecommunications)Health careHand washingClostridium difficilePublic healthEnvironmental healthPersonal protective equipmentMedical emergencyIntensive care medicineNursingDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)AntibioticsMicrobiologyInternal medicinePathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Healthcare associated infections (HAIs) are considered an important public health problem. In a 2012 report by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), it was estimated that 5% to 10% of patients hospitalized in Canada will develop a HAI. Pathogens (microorganisms) that cause HAIs can be transmitted from other patients, hospital personnel, or the hospital/medical centre environment. Microorganisms can be transmitted to patients via direct or indirect contact, and health care workers are often the conduit for this transmission. These microorganisms can include such pathogens as Clostridium difficile and antibiotic-resistant organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The hands of a health care worker can become contaminated by any procedures involving contact with patients, including taking a pulse, blood pressure, or body temperature. The health care worker may then have contact with other patients, resulting in cross-transmission or cross-infection from health care worker to patient.The World Health Organization considers hand hygiene – handwashing using soap and water or a disinfectant hand rub – to be an important process in the prevention of pathogen transmission by the contact route. However, there are questions regarding aspects of hand hygiene which may impact adequate hand disinfection. Two issues are the wearing of hand or wrist jewellery and wearing nail polish. It has been found that skin under rings may be more heavily colonized with microorganisms than the rest of the hand, and that rings may also increase the risk of glove tears. Wrist jewellery may prevent proper washing of the skin, and skin may not be dried properly following handwashing if wrist jewellery is present. As well, chipped nail polish or nail polish worn for more than four days has been shown to foster the presence of microorganisms which resist removal by handwashing. Some guidelines have previously recommended that when performing hand hygiene, nails be free of nail polish, and no wearing of jewellery below the elbows, but it is felt that the evidence supporting these recommendations may be inconclusive. Considering the differing opinions regarding the role that the wearing of nail polish and hand or wrist jewellery might have in impacting disinfection during the handwashing process, this report aims to review the current clinical evidence and evidence-based guideline recommendations for this procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Same topicInfection Control in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207